The "iconic" characters -- time to for them to die?

Kill the iconics?

  • Oh yeah! Burn, Ember, Burn!

    Votes: 92 38.5%
  • But, but .... I *love* Lidda.

    Votes: 123 51.5%
  • Ironics?

    Votes: 24 10.0%

Akrasia

Procrastinator
So the 3.0 books introduced these critters. Mialee, Lidda, Jozan, Regdar, and so forth.

What a bunch of losers! ;)

Seriously, they were tiresome when they first appeared, IMO, and they get more annoying with each new picture.

They all seem so insipid. Why couldn't WotC have resurrected Emrikol the Chaotic, Mordenkainen, and Bigby? Those guys had 'tude, dude! :cool:

Views?
 
Last edited:

log in or register to remove this ad

I'm all for both Ironics ("Iconic" strange combos) and new featured PC personalities, but you've got to realize that the standard Iconics are not there for our amusement. They exist to give new players a baseline -- for educational purposes.

As such, they're quite useful and successful.

And I love Lidda. :uhoh:

-- N
 

Nifft said:
I'm all for both Ironics ("Iconic" strange combos) and new featured PC personalities, but you've got to realize that the standard Iconics are not there for our amusement. They exist to give new players a baseline -- for educational purposes.

As such, they're quite useful and successful.

And I love Lidda. :uhoh:

-- N
Yeah, well, who doesn't? Even Mialee is partial to her charms.

Keep the iconics, and make a thread in off-topic where they give relationship advice, is what I say.
 

Nifft said:
... but you've got to realize that the standard Iconics are not there for our amusement. They exist to give new players a baseline -- for educational purposes. ...

Bah! We didn't need such hand-holding in *my* day. All we needed were our wits, some dice, and a thesaurus to decipher the occasional Gygaxianism.

But even if I buy your explanation, couldn't WotC have chosen cool characters? (Again, I direct you to the fine example of Emrikol the Chaotic.)
:cool:
 
Last edited:

But Emrikol wasn't that cool....

The iconics are fine, some people had use for them and that's great, but they are also really easy to ignore.
 


I don't care what happens to the iconics, just leave Vedania alive. She's too cute to die. ;)

Berandor said:
Yeah, well, who doesn't? Even Mialee is partial to her charms.

Keep the iconics, and make a thread in off-topic where they give relationship advice, is what I say.
I like that idea!

Step 1: Put Krusk in charge of a relationship advice column.
Step 2: ???????
Step 3: Profit.
 

Nifft said:
I'm all for both Ironics ("Iconic" strange combos) and new featured PC personalities, but you've got to realize that the standard Iconics are not there for our amusement. They exist to give new players a baseline -- for educational purposes.

They should have used the Chosen from FR as the baseline for new players.
 

Dark Jezter said:
I don't care what happens to the iconics, just leave Vedania alive. She's too cute to die. ;)


I like that idea!

Step 1: Put Krusk in charge of a relationship advice column.
Step 2: ???????
Step 3: Profit.

*twitches at the notion of Krusk in a pointy hat stealing underpants*
 

They should have a backstabbing, a-social iconic played by a god damn munchkin. Thats what I think.

Maybe they should outsource writing the iconics to Ab3, who has a great site about dysfunctional characters .. and players :)
 

Remove ads

Top