BSF
Explorer
Dark Jezter said:I never intended my poll to influence WotC policy, but it is interesting to see just how many people like 3e's artwork in relation to the comparatively small number of people who dislike it.
~ ~ ~
Now who's the one making assumptions?
Umm, I didn't vote in your poll. Maybe I missed it. Maybe I looked at it and decided the discussion and poll weren't anything I wanted to devote any time to. Heck, I wouldn't have voted in this one except that it was so amusing and I could pimp Piratecat's Iconography story.
I dislike a lot of the art in 3E. It's not that it isn't well done, I just don't like a lot of it. But I can appreciate it as something that appeals to a different market than just me. So why should I put forth a lot of effort to slam the art? It's art and it will appeal to different people. My dislike for a lot of the art doesn't make the entire product unusable. Shockingly enough, I don't buy DnD books for their art. If they have art that appeals to me, then the book has more value to me. If the book has abyssmal art, then it might make me think less of the product. If it has well done art that just doesn't appeal to me, then maybe one of my friends will like it? I'm not that concerned about it.
So while Todd Lockwood has good talent, I don't like some of his stuff. I didn't vote in your poll, so you really aren't aware of my perspective (until now.)