Scribe
Legend
No. But now there is a dialogue happening. We need some patience now.
For what? They are 100% still intent on removing 1.0. Nothing else is relevant.
No. But now there is a dialogue happening. We need some patience now.
This is factually wrong. You can grandfather it in.A 'good OGL 1.2' in a world where you allow Wizards to remove OGL 1.0, still removes everything under 1.0.
For what? They are 100% still intent on removing 1.0. Nothing else is relevant.
No, the OGL 1.2 does not deauthorize OGL 1.0(a), that is a separate move by WotC. Nothing in OGL 1.2 invalidates 1.0(a).A 'good OGL 1.2' in a world where you allow Wizards to remove OGL 1.0, still removes everything under 1.0.
What part of anything they have said to date, indicates this is happening?This is factually wrong. You can grandfather it in.
Also wrong.
No, the OGL 1.2 does not deauthorize OGL 1.0(a), that is a separate move by WotC. Nothing in OGL 1.2 invalidates 1.0(a).
However, even if we accept the OGL 1.0(a) is deauthorized (which I don't) it only stops anything new using that license. Just move over to either the CC or OGL 1.2* and your all good.
*Again this assumes the OGL 1.2 is improved as needed.
Yes, but that is separate from OGL 1.2. The could make the OGL 1.0(b) that everyone is asking for and still "deauthorize" OGL 1.0(a). WotC has intentionally, and correctly, separated the two moves.For what? They are 100% still intent on removing 1.0. Nothing else is relevant.
Yes, but that is separate from OGL 1.2. The could make the OGL 1.0(b) that everyone is asking for and still "deauthorize" OGL 1.0(a). WotC has intentionally, and correctly, separated the two moves.
Show me.Everything under the 1.0, would remain there, in some legal limbo, if the 1.0 is deauthorized. Going to CC (and no I wont go to 1.2) wont fix that. Nor will ORC.
Show me. If OGL 1.2 has everything you want (basically a 1.0b) why not move to it?
I don't know what that means.If it was what I wanted, it would have no purpose to exist.