This doesn't work so well with political views, even those on the fringe. As a left-wing Canadian, I can characterize it as a "hoax" when people claim that the 911 terrorists entered the US through my country and even point them to website most people deem credible to refute this as a "hoax." But it doesn't produce the same result as when you go after an urban legend "hoax" -- people react completely differently to their political views being characterized as hoaxes than they would to a chain e-mail being described as such. Generally, when dealing with people whose political views are highly disparate, such a tactic tends to increase the level of animosity rather than defusing it, transforming a situation from annoying e-mails to a raging debate about the future of American society.IronWolf said:We used to do this with some of Lady IronWolf's emails. She would have lots of naive friends who would forward all those silly hoax emails around thinking they were legit. I would just help her find the hoax-buster sites and she would reply to all with several links to how the email was a hoax and has been a known hoax for sometime. This seemed to work quite well for this particular genre of email people like to forward around.
Or maybe she's just hoping to avoid confrontation in the same way I was...