This doesn't work so well with political views, even those on the fringe. As a left-wing Canadian, I can characterize it as a "hoax" when people claim that the 911 terrorists entered the US through my country and even point them to website most people deem credible to refute this as a "hoax." But it doesn't produce the same result as when you go after an urban legend "hoax" -- people react completely differently to their political views being characterized as hoaxes than they would to a chain e-mail being described as such. Generally, when dealing with people whose political views are highly disparate, such a tactic tends to increase the level of animosity rather than defusing it, transforming a situation from annoying e-mails to a raging debate about the future of American society.IronWolf said:We used to do this with some of Lady IronWolf's emails. She would have lots of naive friends who would forward all those silly hoax emails around thinking they were legit. I would just help her find the hoax-buster sites and she would reply to all with several links to how the email was a hoax and has been a known hoax for sometime. This seemed to work quite well for this particular genre of email people like to forward around.