The Son of the Whiney Player thread

Dragonbait

Explorer
While this is not directly related to the Whiney Player thread, it does deal with a whiney player that is in both my gaming groups. The guy flips between a polite and soft-spoken person to a whiney game disruptor, but there is a catch.

I went into rant mode on this one, and I apologize ahead of time:

He gets bored very easily. If combat lasts for more than 3 rounds he gets bored AND if there is role-playing for more than 5 minutes he gets bored. I've told him on a number of occasions that perhaps he just does not like role-playing games, but we both know he does. He is a damage-dealer player. He only sees a character's value in how many dice they roll for damage. All other things are tertiary and unimportant. And yet, he insists on taking other classes like the bard or cleric, then gets bored with them or frustrated with them after three or four sessions. When he is reminded how disgruntled he was all the other times playing class X, he insists that the next time will be different. When he IS a damage dealer, he gets upset if someone can do more damage than he, even if he's the fighter and he's trying to compare his damage to a wizard's spell damage. In fights, when he feels that someone else's character is too powerful (read: more powerful than his character) he starts calling that the enemy is dead before the damage is even rolled. When someone is saying "he's dead" after each hit for two or three rounds, it gets very anticlimactic when the creature actually dies. He can be very passive-aggressive, doing the opposite of what someone recommends if he feels that he is being told what to do. Reverse psychology only works about 50% of the time. He dislikes role-playing with more than 4 other people, and will shut down when the group's number reaches 5. He will eagerly remind people about all the penalties that they suffer from various actions, never remind them about their bonuses, and gets vocally frustrated when he suffers a penalty (like the -4 when shooting into melee). All of this has created a very negative reaction in most players, and people will often nitpick him.

Worst yet, he used to throw temper tantrums. Not the kicking and crying, but the yelling and complaining. Sometimes this would be a result of something in the game, many times he would just show up in a bad mood and apparently look for an argument. Months ago after one of his tantrums the GM and I had a sit-down with him. See the paragraph below for the reason why we did this and did not just boot him from the group. We told him that he would be booted from the group if he did it again because it ruins everyone else's fun. We told him to let us know if he felt like he was being picked on, or to let us know if he came to the game in an argumentative mood. We did this in a very calm manner and he seemed to eagerly accept the terms. He even recently apologized for yelling at me in a game (he didn't yell, and the apology caught be by surprise).

The Catch: All people who know him are certain that he has a learning disability of some sort, if not something far more extreme. He's great with charts and tables, but can not seem to connect action->consequence or think in the abstract. When we use mini's he will not recognize his own in the group unless he's paying close attention. Most recently, everyone else's minis were painted and his was the only non-painted mini. He had used the mini for the past four weeks. He continuously would start to move other people's minis on his turn, having to be reminded that the unpainted mini was his. He could go for rounds not knowing that he started moving the red-cloaked kobold mini instead of the pewter elf wielding twin scimitars. He has a lot of trouble remembering non-numeric or fact-based concepts, like what an NPC says. Writing for him is time-consuming because he will write something, erase it, then rewrite. This will often happen two or three times every time he writes. People that briefly meet him will typically wonder if he is slow. Worst of all, he *knows* that he might be off in some way and has an inferiority complex.

With all that in mind, my groups have a conundrum: There are far too many signs that something is 'off' with him for us to just say that he is 'quirky' like some other players. Do we hold him completely accountable for his actions like we would for anyone else, or do we give him more leeway? We are having a tough time telling where his own personality ends and his inability to mentally cope with things begin (IF he does have some sort of issue) and have flip-flopped between the two for years.
 

log in or register to remove this ad

That’s a rather delicate situation. I would suggest you get your group together and discuss it with them. If the player is ruining the play experience for the rest of them it may be time to gently let him go from the group.
 

From what you have said, he really doesn't seem to be suited to playing roleplaying games. Yes, he may have some sort of learning disability and it might be a bit harsh to boot him from the group because of it. However, there are also other people in the group to consider. If he is ruining the fun for everyone else at the table, is that fair to everyone else?

I'd boot him, but do it gently. Sometimes there isn't a nice and easy way out of a situation.

Olaf the Stout
 

roguerouge

First Post
As a teacher who's had a few students with conditions similar to what's being described here, my inner amateur armchair psychologist is diagnosing Asperger's Syndrome or something mild on the autism scale. (See: http://www.webmd.com/mental-health/tc/aspergers-syndrome-symptoms). I've had students who were extraordinarily disruptive and academically strong and students who were not very disruptive and academically strong. The common factor was that I INSISTED that they had to help me help them. Accommodations are generally feasible, but they're fairly individualized, ranging from dealing with their anxieties, to not putting them in particular situations, to using cards to indicate when they've crossed a social line.

Basically, I'd ask them about it and frame it as them helping you and as not a big deal.
 

Arnwyn

First Post
Olaf the Stout said:
From what you have said, he really doesn't seem to be suited to playing roleplaying games. Yes, he may have some sort of learning disability and it might be a bit harsh to boot him from the group because of it. However, there are also other people in the group to consider. If he is ruining the fun for everyone else at the table, is that fair to everyone else?

I'd boot him, but do it gently. Sometimes there isn't a nice and easy way out of a situation.
I entirely agree with the above. Entirely.

The big questions to ask yourself are:
- How obligated do you feel in giving him a disproportionate amount of attention (both in-game, as well as the between-game prep-work)?
- How much of this do you feel is your responsibility?
- If you want to keep him in the game, why? What are the consequences and drawbacks in doing so? What are the benefits?
- And the harshly-put one: How much of a "charity" do you feel you and your other players are?

Now, I, personally, have a middling to low level of tolerance for anything that negatively affects my (very limited and very precious) free time, so that's why I agree with Olaf the Stout, above. This would be one of my "I'm not a charity" moments. (So please take what I say with a big grain of salt, since you and your players could be much more tolerant people than I am.)
 

sniffles

First Post
Dragonbait said:
Do we hold him completely accountable for his actions like we would for anyone else, or do we give him more leeway?
Just because he may have some type of cognitive disorder doesn't mean he shouldn't still be held accountable for his behavior.

It's been my impression - not being an expert here, but I have worked with developmentally disabled adults in the past - that sometimes you can actually be more blunt with someone like that than you could be with a person who lacks cognitive/developmental challenges. Perhaps when he behaves in an offensive manner, you should try saying, "(Whatever is name is), that isn't acceptable behavior here. You need to stop right now or leave."

If it doesn't work, try something else. It's up to you and your group to decide how much effort you want to put into this relationship.
 

Oryan77

Adventurer
Let him stay in the game.

Make him wear a helmet and then throw nerf balls at him whenever he acts up. It'll be fun for everyone.
 

pogre

Legend
Very tough situation. I don't know what his disability might be, but roleplaying games does not sound like it works very well with his quirks. Unless you are related to him and want to use the game in some manner to "help" him, I would suffer through the pain of letting him go.

Good luck.
 

cougent

First Post
Olaf the Stout said:
From what you have said, he really doesn't seem to be suited to playing roleplaying games. Yes, he may have some sort of learning disability and it might be a bit harsh to boot him from the group because of it. However, there are also other people in the group to consider. If he is ruining the fun for everyone else at the table, is that fair to everyone else?

I'd boot him, but do it gently. Sometimes there isn't a nice and easy way out of a situation.

Olaf the Stout
Arnwyn said:
I entirely agree with the above. Entirely.

The big questions to ask yourself are:
- How obligated do you feel in giving him a disproportionate amount of attention (both in-game, as well as the between-game prep-work)?
- How much of this do you feel is your responsibility?
- If you want to keep him in the game, why? What are the consequences and drawbacks in doing so? What are the benefits?
- And the harshly-put one: How much of a "charity" do you feel you and your other players are?

Now, I, personally, have a middling to low level of tolerance for anything that negatively affects my (very limited and very precious) free time, so that's why I agree with Olaf the Stout, above. This would be one of my "I'm not a charity" moments. (So please take what I say with a big grain of salt, since you and your players could be much more tolerant people than I am.)
For all the same reasons mentioned, I would invite him to leave.

Why do you play? I play to have fun. My players play to have fun. Someone break fun, someone must go. That easy and that quick.
 

TheAuldGrump

First Post
Ugh. Now this one is a hard one.

I am not at all sure that there is a good solution. The only thing I can come up with is 'talk to him out of game'. :(

If that does not clear matters up, then ask him to leave the game. If, as you say, there is a base problem then that may end up being the only answer. Which is rough on both of you, since there may not be a whole lot that he can do about it.

But remember, the game is supposed to be fun for everyone, and if he is ruining the fun for you and the other players then why bother playing?

The Auld Grump
 

Remove ads

Top