The film has received generally negative reviews from critics. It currently scores a 14% positive rating from 49 reviews, with only 7 being "fresh", on the movie review aggregate site Rotten Tomatoes, the concensus being, "Though its visuals are unique, The Spirit's plot is almost incomprehensible, the dialogue is ludicrously mannered, and the characters are unmemorable." Roger Ebert of the Chicago Sun-Times said, "There is not a trace of human emotion in it. To call the characters cardboard is to insult a useful packing material". Frank Lovece of Newsday, and a one-time comic book writer, found that, "Gorgeous cinematography and design can't mask the hollow core and bizarre ugliness of this mishandled comics adaptation," and noted that while Eisner's own Spirit was "an average-Joe [...] in a rumpled suit — a vulnerable but insouciant Everyman in humanist fables", Miller's Spirit "now has a superpower — a healing factor. Eisner's own spirit must be spinning in its grave". Owen Gleiberman of Entertainment Weekly, noting that he "stand outside the circle of comic-book obsessives", found the movie a "ludicrously knowing and mannered noir pastiche, full of burnt-end romance and 'style, but robotic at its core".A.O. Scott in The New York Times summed up, "To ask why anything happens in Frank Miller's sludgy, hyper-stylized adaptation of a fabled comic book series by Will Eisner may be an exercise in futility. The only halfway interesting question is why the thing exists at all".[