I didn't use that as a defense. I was simply providing a correction to the misconception that it was somehow new.Its funny that "It was always bad, so it doesn't matter if its again bad (and arguably worse than the previous edition)" is an accepted defence now.
Isn't a new product supposed to be better than the old one? Apparently not...
I too think it's unacceptable and that WOTC needs to tighten its editing practices.