ozziewolf
First Post
Not really. We're looking at a pretty new set of rules, and it's easy to miss the fact that not all triggered actions have to be immediate reactions or the fact that immediate reactions can't be used on your own turn. Freelancers are human too, sometimes mistakes get made and slip past the editors.
RAW are crystal clear. RAW also makes these items out to be extremely limited in usefulness, especially when compared to equivalently-priced weapons (compare Impaling with the RAW limit on when its power can be used to Terror Weapons or Thunderburst Weapons, for instance). Nobody's debating RAW, it's RAI that is being questioned here.
Examining the information again I can see where you guys are coming from on the fact that perhaps the rule itself isn't being used as it was intended with these items. I do think it's kind of a clever use of the rules as long as it's balanced out accordingly with other items.
It didn't occur to me to compare it to items of similar value. If it's the case where it makes it significantly weaker than other items that are supposed to be on par with it then I would agree it needs to be looked at. (I'm not saying it does or doesn't at this point as I still haven't taken the time to compare items and I don't know that I will any time soon.)