Lord Pendragon
First Post
If Slaadi really are Chaotic-Neutral, shouldn't PCs occasionally run across them doing something good? If Slaadi never do anything good, doesn't that make them Evil?
At the very least they should occasionally express good qualities. Honor, mercy, loyalty, what-have-you. But I've never encountered a game where they ever did. They seem to be devoid of good action or behavior, and are yet somehow not evil, which bugs me.Sejs said:I can see where you're coming from, but things sort of boil down to the old axiom of "just because they're not evil doesn't mean they have to like you."
I don't now enough about Formians to say. Do they, like the Borg, seek to conquer the entire multiverse, regardless of whatever destruction might come of it?Look at formians for example - they're lawful neutral by nature and they're pretty much the ant outsider version of the Borg.
I would love to see this kind of scenario. This would be the Slaadi doing something good. They may not like the Formian thralls they're freeing, but would free them to fight against the Formian Order. And yet, from the way they're described in the MM and the way I've seen every DM play them, my guess is that the Slaadi would instead take the opportunity to use the thralls as egg incubators. Again, evil.Although that does lead to an interesting scenario of a formian hive working to assimilate folks and the slaadi working to liberate the thralls just because of the principle of the matter, thereby making the slaadi the default 'good guys'.
Lord Pendragon said:They may not like the Formian thralls they're freeing, but would free them to fight against the Formian Order. And yet, from the way they're described in the MM and the way I've seen every DM play them, my guess is that the Slaadi would instead take the opportunity to use the thralls as egg incubators. Again, evil.
Sejs said:Look at formians for example - they're lawful neutral by nature and they're pretty much the ant outsider version of the Borg.
But this only reinforces the fact that Slaadi, as portrayed, are Chaotic-Evil. They are selfish, uncaring of others (as illustrated by your belief that they really wouldn't care about any thralls,) and needlessly cruel.The Amazing Dingo said:I think that they would fight against the Formorians, however they might not make any attempts to really save any of the thralls or potential thralls. Casualities are a part of war and usually happen during those Chaotic times.
Yeah, I could see that scenario being taken the wrong way and ending up like you described. Personally, I would have the Slaadi free the thralls, set them on their merry little way (with the understanding that if they meet again there's no promises made on how that encounter will turn out), and then turn and use the Formains as egg hosts.I would love to see this kind of scenario. This would be the Slaadi doing something good. They may not like the Formian thralls they're freeing, but would free them to fight against the Formian Order. And yet, from the way they're described in the MM and the way I've seen every DM play them, my guess is that the Slaadi would instead take the opportunity to use the thralls as egg incubators. Again, evil.
I wish your view was more common. It would make it easier to believe that the Slaadi are really Chaotic-Neutral, and not merely evil baddies that the paladin doesn't get to smite.Sejs said:Yeah, I could see that scenario being taken the wrong way and ending up like you described. Personally, I would have the Slaadi free the thralls, set them on their merry little way (with the understanding that if they meet again there's no promises made on how that encounter will turn out), and then turn and use the Formains as egg hosts.