I love freedom and liberty, but recognize it also has its limits and demands corresponding duties to your fellow man in a functioning society.
Why do you hate civility and politeness?
Why do you hate civility and politeness?
I usually invent my responses, as I do not quote or link that often when I give a response.Heh.
I feel the old levels of snark rising up inside me.
Ahem. Here it comes:
Yes. You can. You can help me not like what you wrote, because what you wrote assumed I said something I did not, and so you did help in my dislike thereof. You also can help me be snarky and avoid answering anything you ask, and in fact you are doing so right now with the way you yourself are avoiding responding to what I actually said.
In a conversation you follow what the other person is saying and then you respond to it. You do not invent responses and then act like those happened. Quoting me and then playing it as a response to something different that I didn't say anything at all about is not a conversation, it is baiting and it is rude.
Those have no bearing on the case here. The lady's letter was both civil and polite. As for duty of Halloween, let me laugh. /laughsI love freedom and liberty, but recognize it also has its limits and demands corresponding duties to your fellow man in a functioning society.
Why do you hate civility and politeness?
It was neither, according to the standards proffered by Ms. Manners, and I'll take her view on matters like these more seriously than yours, based in what I've read of the writings of the two of you.The lady's letter was both civil and polite.
What is wrong in a liberal democracy is bullying and intimidation...
Sure, she could have done that, but there is no requirement that she does it. If a pair of Mormon missionaries knock on your door, you could open the door and be polite to them (invite them in or say no thank you), or you could just say "What the f do you want?" If some kid goes to her house begging for candy, she can give them candy, give them nothing, or give them the letter. It's her choice what she does. It may not be the kosher thing to do, but it's her choice.Orrrr...
The woman in question could have followed the rules of sociey & etiquette- see the above cites to Ms. Manners- and simply keep her anti-fat crusade to herself on Halloween and not participate in the giving of any candy (or anything else). No fat kids get poisoned, no fat kid gets humiliated.
That is perfectly acceptable. There are people in our neighborhood who don't participate in the candy giveaway- for whatever reason*- and nobody cares that they don't.
Better angels, yada, yada, yada.
* concerns over candy & obesity, dental health, the holiday's pagan roots, or what have you.
She is giving it to kids who show up at her door.
So what? There are times when you will be humiliated in front of other people. Also, it's not as if fat people don't get humiliated in front of their friends, co-workers, family members, and complete strangers. The kid learns a lesson, and they'll be able to handle things in the future. Also, it's not as if this lady is reading the letter to the kid and his friends at her door....in full view of the other children, in a breach of the expectations of the holiday celebration.
Very true, which means that you already know the type of person you are sending your kids to go interact with when you let them knock on her door. You should have a pretty good idea of what to expect.My guess is she's already "popular" in the neighborhood, though. Misanthropy like this doesn't manifest itself only once per year.
So what?
You're assuming her intent is to humiliate them. As I mentioned previously in my conversation with Umbran, that isn't always the result. Some kids may find the letter to be aversive. Others may not. They may or may not follow the advice she is giving them in the letter.People do get humiliated in all kinds of situations. Which means there's not much point in doing so intentionally unless you've got a sadistic streak.
You're assuming her intent is to humiliate them.