Hypersmurf said:Well, it's debatable.
An assassin casts spells just as a bard does.
and
Because the somatic components required for bard spells are relatively simple, a bard can cast bard spells while wearing light armor without incurring the normal arcane spell failure chance. However, like any other arcane spellcaster, a bard wearing medium or heavy armor or using a shield incurs a chance of arcane spell failure if the spell in question has a somatic component (most do). A multiclass bard still incurs the normal arcane spell failure chance for arcane spells received from other classes.
Now, it could be argued that an assassin casts bard spells in light armor without incurring ASF, but arcane spells from other classes (like assassin) still suffer.
It could also be argued that since the bard's ability to cast in light armor without ASF is detailed in the Weapon and Armor Proficiency section instead of the Spells section, it's inapplicable to the assassin.
But it can certainly also be argued that the assassin casts assassin spells in light armor like a bard casts bard spells in light armor - that is, with no ASF.
-Hyp.
But think about this angle;
Bard spells obviously are far more dependant on the verbal component; thus lessening the need for the somantic component; and thus there really is an equal exchange (perhaps not mechanicly in the game but certainly conceptually).
I would think that the last thing an assassin spell would have would be more of a verbal component; as assassins try to be quiet. If anything perhaps even more of a somatic component that other spells on other spell lists of the same name.