Quasqueton
First Post
Am I correct in thinking that the +1 shield bonus from two-weapon defense is granted only when the character takes the full attack action and uses both weapons in the attacks?
Quasqueton
Quasqueton
I wouldn't. Assuming the weapons are drawn, the player char should be in a position to use them.Jhyrryl said:Unlike an actual shield, I would rule that the shield bonus from this feat does not apply when flat-footed.
TWO-WEAPON DEFENSE [GENERAL]
Prerequisites: Dex 15, Two-Weapon Fighting.
Benefit: When wielding a double weapon or two weapons (not including natural weapons or unarmed strikes), you gain a +1 shield bonus to your AC.
When you are fighting defensively or using the total defense action, this shield bonus increases to +2.
Special: A fighter may select Two-Weapon Defense as one of his fighter bonus feats.
TWO-WEAPON FIGHTING [GENERAL]
You can fight with a weapon in each hand. You can make one extra attack each round with the second weapon.
Prerequisite: Dex 15.
Benefit: Your penalties on attack rolls for fighting with two weapons are reduced. The penalty for your primary hand lessens by 2 and the one for your off hand lessens by 6.
Normal: If you wield a second weapon in your off hand, you can get one extra attack per round with that weapon. When fighting in this way you suffer a –6 penalty with your regular attack or attacks with your primary hand and a –10 penalty to the attack with your off hand. If your off-hand weapon is light the penalties are reduced by 2 each. (An unarmed strike is always considered light.)
Special: A 2nd-level ranger who has chosen the two-weapon combat style is treated as having Two-Weapon Fighting, even if he does not have the prerequisite for it, but only when he is wearing light or no armor.
A fighter may select Two-Weapon Fighting as one of his fighter bonus feats.
That's not how I read them. It seems that for you to make off hand attacks, you must wield teh weapon, sort of like a prerequisite. If that is indeed the case, you get the bonus when it is in your hand.Quasqueton said:What is/was making me think the way I do/did is the term "wield" used in both the defense and fighting feats [emphasis mine]:
*snip*
In the two-weapon fighting description, the word wield is referring to attacking. I assumed the same word used in the same context in two-weapon defense meant the same thing.
Quasqueton
Jhyrryl said:Unlike an actual shield, I would rule that the shield bonus from this feat does not apply when flat-footed.
I believe that the rules use the word wield to mean use or handle rather than to mean just attacking.Quasqueton said:In the two-weapon fighting description, the word wield is referring to attacking. I assumed the same word used in the same context in two-weapon defense meant the same thing.
Quasqueton