Hi Anubis mate!
Anubis said:
So you advocate that Devastating Critical, a feat which you yourself have said should be toned down a little, be the balancing factor for Epic characters?
Actually your confused (again) its Annihilating Strike thats broken, NOT Devastating Critical.
Anubis said:
Seems to be kinda fishy to me. Besides, not all characters will have Devastating Critical.
Its pretty much guaranteed all 200th-level Barbarians; Fighters and Paladins will have it (Rangers have Death of Enemies).
Anubis said:
Also, it's hard to hit something that can fly over your head and smack you around while you can do nothing to strike back . . . I think that kills your little idea . . .
Am I not allowed any missile weapons now as well?
Whats the next handicap. A 200th-level Wizard in an Anti-Magic Room with a dozen Hecatonchieres?
Anubis said:
On a side note, I have thought about the SR issue, and I think perhaps it SHOULD be based on CR and not ECL. Make caster level checks for SR and dispel be based on spellcaster SR, and base SR itself on actual CR, and SR actually continues to be useful.
I'm not sure yet if its wise to mess around with Spell Resistance?
Anubis said:
As for the wealth issue, until you can come up with a system of limiting wealth that actually works for ALL campaigns, and actually let us know what it is, I will not be convinced that you know the answer.
I already did.
Seemingly either I'm not explaining it right (if so, sorry) or you're just not getting it?
What mechanics or philosophy don't you understand?
Anubis said:
Now on to the next issue . . . I said previously:
"On top of that, you have to have a standard to go by, and a simple formula, and you're just not coming up with one. Yeah, you have formulas for the wealth, but as of yet, you have not given ANY formula or standard to limit magic items."
Your reply was:
"Both the DMG and the ELH already have a standard for this. Thats why I never mentioned it."
The problem I have with that statement is simply that YOU advocate going up AGAINST the standard presented by the DMG and the ELH. The ELH states that character can have up to three items worth between 10-20% of their wealth. You advocate getting rid of that rule altogether.
So again, I will ask, what standard do you propose to FAIRLY limit magic items after a certain point?
I advocate using the '3 items between 10-25% rule' for my Personal Equipment Table (CR^3 x 100 GP).
Since you already started the 200th-level character vs. a Prismatic Great Wyrm and used this exact formula to outline personal equipment I thought that much was obvious (my apologies if it wasn't).
Anubis said:
One more thing . . . When will you be able to get around to judging the base ECL/CR of the Saiyan race I posted? This isn't just for me, but for all those interested in using Saiyans. This is vitally important.
I'll do it after I finish with this thread.
We sorted the half-saiyan and the different flavours of super-saiyans right!?
Anubis said:
Anyway, thanks in advance.
No problem mate, sorry for my tardiness.
Anubis said:
By the way, sorry to nitpick, but . . .
I wouldn't mind the nitpicks so much if they were ever right...
Anubis said:
Power Attack is limited by the base attack bonus, which stops increasing at Level 20. (The ELH *only* allows the epic bonus to stack with the base attack bonus for purposes of feat prerequisites.)
Actually if you had read the recent Epic Level Handbook Chat Night Transcript at Wizards site you would know that in the errata they are going to absorb EAB into BAB (to avoid confusion) and simply cap attacks at #4.
Also it makes no sense to allow monsters to have massive power attacks and not characters.
Anubis said:
Another note is that Penetrate Damage Reduction can only be taken once.
I don't see why? (though in fairness the ELH should have made it clear one way or the other that it either stacks or doesn't stack rather than simply leaving it blank)
The fact that it actually stacks with both
ki strike and magic weapons would seem to favour that it does in fact stack...and I see no reason why it shouldn't be allowed to do so anyway!?