hong said:The very first 3E game I was in, someone played a dwarven barbarian modelled on the trollslayers. He had the mohawk, a dwarven urgrosh, and a grudge against goblins. He was completely nuts. Damn, we had fun.![]()
Heheh. Yeah, I use a slayer mini for my dwarven fighter/barbarian/ranger/frenzied berserker.
hellbender said:I can see your point totally and I agree. The DnD approach is fine as well, but the Warhammer approach is more realistic and obviously more gritty. Starting characters are pretty wretched in WHFRPG, and that is a good thing, the world is harsh, uncaring and everyone is out to get you. .
Yeah, give me a wizard-burning warrior-priest garbed in barbed-wire armor over a happy, shiny priest of Pelor any old day of the week.
I don't know if I'd try to preserve every aspect of the WHFRPG when making a d20 conversion (after all, at some point you have to ask yourself what you're trying to gain my doing the conversion). Personally, I relish the adversity of Warhammer, but not the notion that starting characters should be feeble. What fun is it to be powerless when some nasty chaos daemon pops up on the board? Brandish that great weapon and have at it!
Last edited: