darjr
I crit!
Yea. I’m noting it down.That is probably the best description of what constitutes an edition change that I have read.
Works too with Basic vs others versions of D&D too. And Call if Cthulhu or Vampire or GURPS or Hero
Yea. I’m noting it down.That is probably the best description of what constitutes an edition change that I have read.
I honestly think that is precisely what we will see in 2024: a new Core set of books acknowledged as 6E by WotC, but that will work smoothly with a mixed 2014/2024 options table. It's very doable because of the exception based ruleset with a modular nature.We could, but I believe that is much less likely than people calling it 6e, even if it doesn't warrant that description, IMO.
What advantage does WotC gain by calling it 6e?I honestly think that is precisely what we will see in 2024: a new Core set of books acknowledged as 6E by WotC, but that will work smoothly with a mixed 2014/2024 options table. It's very doable because of the exception based ruleset with a modular nature.
At the moment, nothing, hence their focus on assuring us that they will be compatible, and demonstrating they all be with products like Monsters of the Multiverse. But once they have established that the rules are really compatible, confirming that it is 6E will be worth some sales.What advantage does WotC gain by calling it 6e?
Heh, as far as I can tell, they will ambiguously call it the "anniversary edition", without committing themselves to a "number".
So you are saying something like:At the moment, nothing, hence their focus on assuring us that they will be compatible, and demonstrating they all be with products like Monsters of the Multiverse. But once they have established that the rules are really compatible, confirming that it is 6E will be worth some sales.
I mean, if it's just what I would do, I would make 6e, and it would be a rebuild of 4e taking lessons from prior editions the way 5e was a rebuild of 3e taking lessons from prior editions. A shiny new coat on a slightly altered core with better (much, much, MUCH better) presentation.That’s because that is what I’m interested in? What would you do? What do you think WotC would?
Not if you think it’s possible or not.
It’s not like a rocket launch, all or nothing. It’s more like what really happened to the James Webb through no fault of the engineers, it got hit by space debris.
"Need" is a strong word, but if they make the package attractive enough (tons of new high quality fantasy art, integrating popular rule variants from ten years of supplements, etc...), then they could get some serious buy-in. And people who don't want to buy in will be (relatively) relaxed if they know that they can still show up to games with their old books and not be turned away. We already know from Monsters of the Multiverse what the new approach to Monsters looks like, and...you can use them interchangeable with early 5E stuff.So you are saying something like:
The 5e diehards who will stick with 5e will likely also know that it will remain compatible, but everyone else will assume they need to buy the new edition?
I think they've tipped their hand with the D&D movie previews bow: I think we will see a major preview of the new rules in the Starter Set next month thing into thr movie.
From what we have seen so far, the screenshots of the basic rules are rearranged from those in the original Starter Set...the rules thar are identical between the Starter Set, PHB, Basic rules, amd Essentials Kit. So I think we will see the revised core basic rules of the game in their entirety, based on nesrly a decade of feedback and Sage Advice work.What kind of new rules do you suspect we will see?
(Druid becoming owlbear is no big deal. It is still the same game engine.)
Wow. So you are expecting some game engine updates?the screenshots of the basic rules are rearranged from those in the original Starter Set...
the rules that are identical between the Starter Set, PHB, Basic rules, and Essentials Kit.
So I think we will see the revised core basic rules of the game in their entirety, based on nearly a decade of feedback and Sage Advice work.