I'm responding to this first and foremost. The rest will come in a later post, because you were 100% being patronizing.
Exhibit A: "Are some of you really that hurt?"
Hurt implies a seeing the other side as immature, especially on the internet. It is also seen as being an incorrect response in our modern society, as if emotions can be wrong.
Exhibit B: "Is the other side going to start throwing fits"
Implies that you view us as whiny and immature. If nothing else in the post was intended as an ad hominem, this definitely was.
Exhibit C: "This is utter and complete madness. "
Trying to dismiss us as crazy.
Exhibit D: "It is picking a fight with the kid who complimented your shoes."
Another example of viewing us as children.
Exhibit E: "Good Lord."
Trying to dismiss us as unreasonable.
Verdict: You attempted a "reductio ad absurdum", but ended up with an ad hominem and strawman argument.
Sorry Acerak, I choose all of those words again to show the childish viewpoint people are taking,
ie - only being able to see one side. I commented about a cantina positively. I expect the readers of this board, who are adults and imho, smarter than the average bear, to be able to dismiss a single comment about cantina style play from 150 pages ago, and use the context it was used in. (Because an adult can act like a child sometime - even me.
)
And please notice where I think this is going. For the other side to,
only be able to see one side. See how I was simply stating that it is foolish. The example I use about shoes is appropriate, because a group is only seeing one tiny piece of the information. I have seen three other posters beside myself use cantina several times, and in every single post, they insist there is no good or bad, no right or wrong, just preferences. Yet, like some children, all anyone can see or read is - they do not like cantina style play - therefore, they are saying I am wrong. So the analogy is perfectly appropriate for the situation.
And good lord is used to represent the exasperation... you know, like Charlie Brown saying "good grief." Why exasperation? Because I was having a civil and communicative discussion with two posters. It was going places, in my belief. We were truly narrowing down the differences between the DM/Player power structure. That is a great thing! But... along comes a group that insists a word can't be used because there might have been one poster somewhere 200 pages ago that used it negatively.
I believe the thing to do is take it in context of the individual. If that is done, then perhaps anyone who thinks cantina is a bad word could reflect on why, and better yet, reflect on who is saying it, and
then determine if it is negative. I certainly reflected when I received two posts about it being negative. I went back to my original post and reread it. I found only positive connotations.