payn
Glory to Marik
I like the Watchmen movie for what it is, but it is entirely the wrong tone for that novel. Nobody in that film looks or feels worn out. That is a HUGE part of the novel. The characters are on point philosophically, but even given shot for shot panel remakes, no one looks like they should.
Snyder definitely went for the deconstruction bit over the cold war miasma. Probably a decision for a general audience that likely wouldn't remember the feel of the cold war. I did think it hit the notes from time to time and was more subtle than it likely needed to be. I for sure think that Malin Akerman and Matthew Goode seemed much too young for the roles. Though, Patrick Wilson and Jackie Earl Haley were perfect.Right. It was not a cold war dread film, which is a problem because it is a cold war dread book. I am just barely old enough to get it. I remember "tornado drills" that absolutely were not "tornado drills." By trying to make it "current" Snyder turned it into the worst interpretation of Watchmen: a super hero deconstruction. That's there, for sure, but it doesn't exist in a vacuum. That deconstruction is intimately tied to the feeling of impotence of the cold war. Without that, it's a different thing entirely.
Note: I am an engineer these days, but a lifetime ago I got a English Lit degree and my capstone was a Watchmen paper.