Corinnguard
Hero
Sometimes.I'm looking forward to see the art for the new Aasimar, Tiefling, and Goliath lineages (anyone else still think of species and lineages as races and subraces in their heads?)

Sometimes.I'm looking forward to see the art for the new Aasimar, Tiefling, and Goliath lineages (anyone else still think of species and lineages as races and subraces in their heads?)
And not every spell requires a component.
But, psionic spells, in the rules, do. @Yaarel is mistaken that 5e is somehow removing spell components from the game.
I think I want the DMs Guide to handle the species traits swapping. For example, it would be fine if the Elf species swaps its slot-1 and slot-2 spells for a Human feat.One thing that still rubs me the wrong way about the half-orc and half-elf or half-options in PF2 is that there is a feat tax involved. So while there are more options that this opens up, it psychologically feels not good or sub-par. I think that is an issue that must be understood about these things: there is a psychological component to play. It's why many people prefer advantage/disadvantage over (+/-) five to a roll. It feels better to roll two dice and pick the highest or lowest. There is likewise a psychological component to see the half-elf being removed as a particular playable option. Even if we are told that it's still there in the form of "pick elf or human and call yourself a half-elf," that still feels psychologically speaking like it's not actually there because that would probably be what you would also do if there was no half-elf.
Seen this complaint against planetouched being feats too. And people were against feat trees for the same reason.
I never understood the hate for feat trees though. People complained that you had to go through 1-2 meh feats to get the powerful feat.
So the result was only the initial meh feats stayed and the powerful and thematic feats got axed.
Genasi is a strong candid for a core species, with regard to statistical popularity.Does anyone else think there are yet more unannounced races like Gobliniods or Genasi, or Gith?
I approve of spreading genasi propaganda.Genasi is a strong candid for a core species, with regard to statistical popularity.
Here is the 5e 2014 core rules in the Monster Manual. The Psionic trait is a kind of innate magic, whose spells are cast without any spell component.
MM p. 10.
"
PSIONICS
A monster that casts spells using only the power of its mind has the Psionics tag added to its Spellcasting or Innate Spellcasting special trait. This tag carries no special rules of its own, but other parts of the game might refer to it. A monster that has this tag typically doesnt require any components to cast its spells.
"
When casting spells psionically, by the power of ones own mind − ones own soul − the spell effect happens without spell components (whether Verbal, Somatic, or Material).
The need to add the term "typically" probably refers to the spells with a costly GP material component, which itself highlights how painful and aggravating, and interferesome, the costly component is. Delete every spell component from every 2024 spell description. The components entry is a pain point.
Note, not all Psionic magic is spells, but some is. Psionic spellcasting is a subset of Innate Spellcasting. Other methods of Innate Spellcasting beyond Psionic can also happen without spell components.
2024 needs the Glossary to standardize a definition of "Innate Spell" (a specific nonswappable spell) and "Innate Spellcasting" (the ability itself to cast any prepared spells innately), to mean without spell components, including the components that a class feature utilizes. An Innate Spell is always prepared for any available slots that also eschew components for it.
Notice, the "Psionic" tag itself eschews spell components. Tashas Psionic spells cohere with this core rule for Psionic spells.Monsters do not use pc rules.
Quoting the monster manual in a discussion about pc classes and races doesn’t matter.
Pc psionics are magic and use spell components.