D&D 2E What PF2E means for D&D5E

While I agree they should not make a new game based on 5e, I do think there is a massive missed opportunity right now with Paizo.

If they published all their existing AP's as 5e conversions, a ton of people would buy them.
If they published all their existing "new" classes as 5e conversions, a bunch of people would buy them.
If they published all their existing "new" monsters as 5e conversions, a lot of people would buy them.

Bottom line - Paizo is missing out on the opportunity to make a bunch of money, AND gain goodwill with a new segment of the RPG population (which, at this point, is largely unfamiliar with them given the metric crapload of new players who joined with 5e), by not supporting 5e with any of their existing IP.

Now would that be the best use of a small portion of their limited resources? I don't know, but I suspect the answer is yes. I think a crew of 5 people converting stuff to 5e (while the rest continue with PF2) would make more money for the company than the same crew working on, for example, Starfinder going forward. If a lot of 5e fans started buying their 5e support material, some would also try out their 5e-Finder game....I mean PF2.

I'm fairly confidant they have had this discussion and it might be a plan B if PF2 tanks.

They don't really want to rely on WotC long term they may botch 6E for example or mess up 5E etc.
 

log in or register to remove this ad

I will play Pathfinder 2E! Looking forward to giving it a whirl!

I will also keep playing 5E. Just like im playing Starfinder right now.

Plenty of room for more good games.
 

We know the size of the RPG market, I don't think it supports 2 million in sales, TSR at its height (adjusted for inflation) is even bigger than the entire RPG market by almost 2-1 and that was the golden age of the 1E PHB+ red box. Obviously they would not have sold all of the PHB and red box in 81-83 but they probably sold a good chunk of that then.
The RPG market grew from $880 million in mid-2015 to $1.2 billion in mid-2016 and $1.4 billion in 2017. In the latter two, RPGs went from $35 million to $45 million RPGs. About 3% both times, so the RPG market was probably $26 million in 2015. So the RPG market increased by $20 million between 2015 and 2016.
What caused the majority of that growth? 5th Edition.

$20,000,000 per year is a lot of 5e D&D books.

You're also confusing players with buyers, yourself gave 2 million in sales with 9 million players. I think the number is probably closer to 800k-1 million with around the same attach rate.
Assuming 1/5th of people buy a book (which matches Pareto Principe that 80% of your profits come from 20% of your clients), that would be 1,800,000 books sold.

I suspect Mearls would be shouting from the rooftops if they broke a million sales of the PHB.
Why? The game is doing phenomenal well and everyone knows that. What's the benefit of getting into specifics?

A lot of Paizo posters seem to believe their gamers are locked into playing Pathfinder as they love 3.5, I suspect a few of them are shocked they are finding out a few players will go to the hottest thing, in a years time that is gonna be Pathfinder 2. I don't expect they will duplicate a mass desertion as people do not hate 5E like they do 4E.
The HUGE difference is the hottest thing in our small community (ENWorld, Paizo.com, RPG.net) is not big the the RPG community as a whole. When you look at 4Chan and Reddit, Pathfinder 2 isn't nearly as big of news.
And Pathfinder has a core audience that *really* did not want to change editions. And there's a high sunk cost for PF1. The conversion rate from PF1 to PF2 might be smaller than for some D&D Editions.

D&D PHB sales seem to be slowly falling and you can probably get that position on the Amazon sales chart with a few thousand copies sold, not tens of thousands.
That is empirically not true.
PHB Sales.png
The 5e PHB just had it's BEST sales week for the past year. And has seldom dropped out of the top 100 books on Amazon for the past twelve months. It is doing FANTASTIC.

Pathfinder II will sell tens of thousands of copies on release (even 20-40k) and I think that will be enough to knock D&D off its perch on Amazon that week/month.
Maybe for a day. Maybe for a week. But likely not lasting longer. And sales on Paizo.com and local game stores will minimise it's Amazon footprint.
Keep in mind that Starfinder *barely* hit the top 100. The highest it reached on Amazon was 89. The highest the D&D PHB reached was... #1. And during the time Starfinder was released, D&D was alternating between 100 and 50. So Starfinder *might* have beat it for a day. Or might not, depending on who was rising and falling at that moment. There's no sudden comparative drop in PHB sales around the time; its spikes seem unrelated.

However, almost immediately, Starfinder dropped from 89 to below 500. Everyone interested bought it immediately and sales dwindled after, and it's been lurking in the low thousands since.

Gang-buster sales from PF2 might be an Amazon sales rank of 50 or even 25. The lower range of which is where the PHB lives while the high end is where it can hit during a sale. If WotC asks Amazon discount the PHB that month, it will negate the advantage PF2 has.

I think its mostly about a cash infusion for Paizo and to stop the bleeding and get some gamers back and pick u some new ones. They will get some unknown % of the D&D market to buy it, hell I will and I do not plan on moving over to PF2 (I may play PF2 and 5E IDK).
Given Pathfinder 2 will drop in early August at GenCon and 5e won't release a book for another month, I expect a lot of people will but PF2 to see what it's like but not actually play. I expect very robust PDF sales on Paizo's site.

I'm willing to not buy PF2 on the 1st week or 2 of release, I bet it will beat 5E on release (say within the 1st week or 2). If I am right how about you buy me Pathfinder 2 and post it over to New Zealand. If I am wrong I will buy you the latest 5E AP or splat book (similar in price to current books not premium ones or if WotC release a $100 splat). Hell I will make it any 5E book of your choice up the Amazon book price of PF2? If you live in the USA I will Amazon it to you, if you're in the UK it will b Amazon or Bookdepository.com
It's tempting.
Really... I think the biggest factor won't be PF2 but if D&D continues to grow and expand. If 5e continues how it's going, then 5e might add more new gamers in 2018-19 than Paizo has in total... Or it could plateau hard as it expands as far as it can and sales start sliding. Eighteen months is a long time.
Plus, it really depends on the response to the playtest and if it appears Paizo is taking feedback seriously. If the game isn't popular or well received, that could be a huge blow.

BTW I assume you are DavidJester on the Paizo forums?
http://paizo.com/people/JesterDavid
 

I still do not get this obsession with sales numbers and professed loyalty to one game over another. Pathfinder 2e is simply another game out of innumerable number of games to choose from. Additional choice and diversity can only be a good thing.
 



The RPG market grew from $880 million in mid-2015 to $1.2 billion in mid-2016 and $1.4 billion in 2017. In the latter two, RPGs went from $35 million to $45 million RPGs. About 3% both times, so the RPG market was probably $26 million in 2015. So the RPG market increased by $20 million between 2015 and 2016.
What caused the majority of that growth? 5th Edition.

$20,000,000 per year is a lot of 5e D&D books.


Assuming 1/5th of people buy a book (which matches Pareto Principe that 80% of your profits come from 20% of your clients), that would be 1,800,000 books sold.


Why? The game is doing phenomenal well and everyone knows that. What's the benefit of getting into specifics?


The HUGE difference is the hottest thing in our small community (ENWorld, Paizo.com, RPG.net) is not big the the RPG community as a whole. When you look at 4Chan and Reddit, Pathfinder 2 isn't nearly as big of news.
And Pathfinder has a core audience that *really* did not want to change editions. And there's a high sunk cost for PF1. The conversion rate from PF1 to PF2 might be smaller than for some D&D Editions.


That is empirically not true.
View attachment 94986
The 5e PHB just had it's BEST sales week for the past year. And has seldom dropped out of the top 100 books on Amazon for the past twelve months. It is doing FANTASTIC.


Maybe for a day. Maybe for a week. But likely not lasting longer. And sales on Paizo.com and local game stores will minimise it's Amazon footprint.
Keep in mind that Starfinder *barely* hit the top 100. The highest it reached on Amazon was 89. The highest the D&D PHB reached was... #1. And during the time Starfinder was released, D&D was alternating between 100 and 50. So Starfinder *might* have beat it for a day. Or might not, depending on who was rising and falling at that moment. There's no sudden comparative drop in PHB sales around the time; its spikes seem unrelated.

However, almost immediately, Starfinder dropped from 89 to below 500. Everyone interested bought it immediately and sales dwindled after, and it's been lurking in the low thousands since.

Gang-buster sales from PF2 might be an Amazon sales rank of 50 or even 25. The lower range of which is where the PHB lives while the high end is where it can hit during a sale. If WotC asks Amazon discount the PHB that month, it will negate the advantage PF2 has.


Given Pathfinder 2 will drop in early August at GenCon and 5e won't release a book for another month, I expect a lot of people will but PF2 to see what it's like but not actually play. I expect very robust PDF sales on Paizo's site.


It's tempting.
Really... I think the biggest factor won't be PF2 but if D&D continues to grow and expand. If 5e continues how it's going, then 5e might add more new gamers in 2018-19 than Paizo has in total... Or it could plateau hard as it expands as far as it can and sales start sliding. Eighteen months is a long time.
Plus, it really depends on the response to the playtest and if it appears Paizo is taking feedback seriously. If the game isn't popular or well received, that could be a huge blow.


http://paizo.com/people/JesterDavid

Sure it could blow up in their face (and I would not be surprised if it did).

I just think you are getting over enthusiastic with some of your claims. We know roughly how many copies of books were sold in the golden age. Adjusted for inflation its 65-80 million dollars at its height.

Mearls specifically claimed 5E has outsold most editions of D&D and Mistwell asked him specifically if it had outsold 3.0 and 3.5 combined. That was a few months ago so maybe it has hit a million now IDK not disputing it is doing very well. Its beaten everything apart from BECMI and 1E based on what Mearls said.

Long term I do not see mass defections from 5E and even a few % points would be great for Paizo. 3E was verybig atone point and a fixed version of it could be appealing and they are adopting a lot of 5E ideas into it.

Hell if you took the 5E PHB, ripped out the classes and feats and plugged in microfeats and 3.X type classes you would have a fun game yes? Alot of PF2 seems to be heading in that direction.

I doubt we will switch over 100% unless we start getting sick of 5E a bit more in 18 months and Paizo knocks it out of the park. Still not a fan of WAR art there is that as well.
 


Your link says that low choice is just as bad as a lot of choice.

You think we have a low number of RPG choices out there, when it says the limit in choices before degradation is around 7?

Regardless, I think a PF2 is a good choice. I just disagree with the general statement that more choices is always good. Sometimes, it's not.
 

While I agree they should not make a new game based on 5e, I do think there is a massive missed opportunity right now with Paizo.

If they published all their existing AP's as 5e conversions, a ton of people would buy them.
If they published all their existing "new" classes as 5e conversions, a bunch of people would buy them.
If they published all their existing "new" monsters as 5e conversions, a lot of people would buy them.

Bottom line - Paizo is missing out on the opportunity to make a bunch of money, AND gain goodwill with a new segment of the RPG population (which, at this point, is largely unfamiliar with them given the metric crapload of new players who joined with 5e), by not supporting 5e with any of their existing IP.

Now would that be the best use of a small portion of their limited resources? I don't know, but I suspect the answer is yes. I think a crew of 5 people converting stuff to 5e (while the rest continue with PF2) would make more money for the company than the same crew working on, for example, Starfinder going forward. If a lot of 5e fans started buying their 5e support material, some would also try out their 5e-Finder game....I mean PF2.
I imagine part of that is staffing. The people at Paizo play Pathfinder and don’t know 5e. They would have trouble designing good 5e monsters and classes, and balancing the encounters necassary to update the APs would be tricky.
But, still, they would be relatively low cost as all the art assets and maps would be done. And they could easily rely on freelancers for the updating. It should be easy money.

But Paizo seems to be curiously stubborn in their desire to stand alone. While their previous philosophy was “if you make products people want, they will pay for it”, that they’re ignoring the large number of 5e fans desperate for content (adventures, classes, a campaign setting) says a lot about how burned they felt by WotC and how much they want to do their own thing.
 

Remove ads

Top