• Welcome to this new upgrade of the site. We are now on a totally different software platform. Many things will be different, and bugs are expected. Certain areas (like downloads and reviews) will take longer to import. As always, please use the Meta Forum for site queries or bug reports. Note that we (the mods and admins) are also learning the new software.
  • The RSS feed for the news page has changed. Use this link. The old one displays the forums, not the news.

What proportion of the population are adventurers?


Registered User
Reading threads like "economy killing spells" got me thinking about how common mages were. This then led to the question of how common adventurers were.

I figure that adventurers come from a fairly small subset of the population - those who have the drive and determination to leave a life as a merchant or scholar or priest, to take up the extremely dangerous role of "adventurer". I also figure that not all strong-willed, determined people will become adventurers. Some would direct their drive and determination into politics or business.

So, is it one in a thousand? One in ten thousand?

The greater territory of Waterdeep has around 2 million people. How many of them are adventurers?


Slayer of Keraptis
They all hang out in the tavern (which is always full of them), but strangely are never ever encountered put in wild or in dungeons. I guess in D&D tabletop, dungeons are instanced 😉
The short--and probably annoying--answer is that it is entirely up to you. This is something that has little to no bearing on actual game play, except insofar as it impacts setting design, and thus your own (as DM) handling of game play. For instance, if you decide on a high ratio of adventurers (say, 1% of population), then PCs are more likely to encounter other groups, especially in dungeons. But if you take a more rare proportion (say 1 in 10,000 or fewer), then your PCs would rarely if ever encounter other adventurers.

Some other factors to consider....

Region: there might be fewer adventurers per capita in a heavily populated region than wilderness. You might have frontier towns where every third person is an adventurer and the majority of the economy is about supporting the adventuring life (sort of like a tourist town), vs a more heavily populated region that is comparatively tame. This also depends upon assumptions about your own setting: is it more "Points of Light" ala 4th edition or set in Italy during the height of Rome? Or maybe Colonial America is a good way to think about it: you had the more populated and "civilized" Atlantic colonies, then the frontier regions. There are adventurers in both areas, but a higher proportion in the frontier: people seeking their fortune, looking for gold and glory, etc.

Another factor is what you consider an "adventurer" might change in different areas. In an urban setting, an "adventurer" might be a street urchin, whereas in an agrarian setting farmers might become adventurers as they defend their home from an orc invasion. Depends on the campaign.

Sometimes "adventurer" is defined as a leveled person: someone who has levels in a character class. If that is the case, then it is probably a higher percentage than people who actively go on "adventures."

I would also imagine that more people try it out quickly retire when they realize what it entails. Sort of like high school graduates who go on a road trip in the summer after they graduate, but then go back to school in the fall.

A related topic is how many adventures are in different tier ranges? Let's say the ratio is 1 in 1,000 are adventurers. So in the Waterdeep region that would be 2,000 adventurers (that makes more sense to me than 1 in 10,000, which would only be 200...maybe 1-2,000 makes sense). I would imagine that the majority of those 2,000 are low level, say 1-4th level. 75% (1500)? Most either don't continue or die off before they reach 5th level. Then at 5-10th level, maybe you have another 15-20% (300-400), maybe 5% (100) are 11th to 15th, and just a handful, maybe 2% or less (<40) are 16th+.

One more thing by way of conclusion. I would consider this a related question to the degree and amount of magic in your setting. While the D&D default is pretty high magic, it can be run low - or at least with very few spellcasters and/or magic items. Similarly with adventurers and to what degree it is part of daily life.
Last edited:


I peg it at about 1/10.000 people are desperate/insane enough to pursue a career in adventuring. About 1/1,000 or so try it, but the initial culling is significant and many either die or move on to more sedate activities.


depends also on what you consider 'adventuring'. For instance, the local clergyman may be 2nd or 3rd level thanks to his preaching and converts, his missions. A member of a local gang is a better scrapper (fighter) than most, a cutpurse has gained notoriety for his sleight of hand. A politician or noble comes to be a lord, representing a nominal level of achievement.


I have one or two other notable "adventuring groups" that the PCs can encounter/interact with.

Other than that, just them and the occasional NPC I require as a friend, foil or foe.

The question really is (say 5e) are the statblocks of higher than 1st level npcs considered "adventurers"?

Then the veterans and bandits fall into the higher than average category, and I use them sparingly.

Or are we asking "how many above 1st level/equivalent" are there? In that case, I used to use S. John Ross, Medieval Demographics Made Easy

But now I just wing it as listed in the opening paragraph.


I've always played as GM about 2% of the adult population has "levels" in some class. They might be retired adventures, or others who picked up skills over the course of their lives, and the rest are still in the game. Of course, this is later separated by class with the base classes having the most individuals.

So in a city of 10000, you might have 200 adventurers. Most would be lower levels (1-4), and in such a city you might have someone as high as 8th or 9th.

I have an old excel spreadsheet I used to randomly generate class and level for all the characters in the world, but it uses 2E information. Someday I might update it to 5E.
Last edited:


Slayer of Keraptis
I suppose the easy answer is to look up the 1e DMG since it explicitly tells you this info. However, I don’t have one handy or I’d do it for you.


Well, hang on here. Are we talking about the percentage of the population that has a PC class? Or are we talking about the percentage of the population that makes a living by going into dungeons, killing monsters, and taking their stuff?

If the question is PC classes... well, let's start with the percentage of professional soldiers in the population. I haven't found any solid stats on this for medieval society, but figures I've seen range from 1-5%. Let's say 2%.

Now, looking in the Monster Manual, the Guard is probably a good example of the typical professional soldier. Guards are reasonably effective in numbers, but one guard is not at all a match for a 1st-level PC, even if you boost the soldier's ability scores to PC levels. So martial PCs are evidently the elite among the professional fighting class; maybe 1 in 5, which is to say, 0.4%.

But that's specifically PCs who are professional warriors: Barbarians, fighters, rangers, and paladins. (I'm not sure whether monks belong on this list or not, but to simplify things I'll say not.) That's 4 classes. There are 12 classes total, so if we triple that figure, we'd be looking at 1.2%.

If the question is professional dungeon crawlers... that figure will depend on how many dungeons the world has, but no matter how you slice it, it's got to be super low. If only 2% of the population is under arms to begin with, what fraction of that armed population can be spared to go poking around in monster-infested ruins looking for gold?
Last edited:

Immortal Sun

About 10% on average. Less in small towns that need every member, more in large cities with excess population. Higher in places that are politically, economically or socially unstable. Less in places that politically, economically and socially stable.


There are enough adventurers to support a market for hiring adventurers.

The way I see it, the vast majority of adventurers are part-timers -- they have a "day job," but when somebody needs to pay 50 gp to drive off some orcs, rescue a missing lad, or investigate the old tower ruins, they might be tempted to step up and try their hand at some light mercenary work. Thug's gotta eat too.

There are relatively few full-time professional adventurers, but enough so that it doesn't raise eyebrows. In fact, often when the PCs tackle an adventure, the person or town paying them has already hired someone else to do the job, and they failed. A surprising number of adventure modules mention that the first people hired for the task are now missing, or have come running back with their tails between their legs.
If we consider that bail bondsman is a similar real-life occupation, Google tells us that there are about 15,500 of them in the US, for a population of less than 330 million. That would mean not a lot of adventurers running around, which is fine for my own standards.


Well, hang on here. Are we talking about the percentage of the population that has a PC class? Or are we talking about the percentage of the population that makes a living by going into dungeons, killing monsters, and taking their stuff?
A good question, and surely one whose answer varies by setting. In one setting an adventurer might be anyone who specializes in digging through the tombs and ruins of the great fallen empires of past, risking their life to reclaim wonders impossible to replicate in the current age. In another they might be an international fighting force that belong to an official guild and are the front line in fighting monsters and other supernatural threats to civilization. In yet another an adventurer might be anyone in the loose community of mercenaries and explorers who populate the frontier, who either take missions on a contract basis or freelance in hopes of striking it rich.

Difference settings will have different demographics depending on how high the bar is set and what areas tolerate heavily armed murderhobos wandering around.


It really depends on the kind of world you want to create, and the nature of that world. People will attempt dangerous things for wealth. I see adventurers much like people heading west as part of the gold rush. There might be a great many of them in a given region, especially of the classes and subclasses who don't require long-term study or devotion (as wizards or clerics typically do).


In my Greyhawk campaigns, about 1% of the population attempts the life of an adventurer. Of those, less than 50% survive their first adventure, so there's a high turnover rate. Most who adventure tend to stop after a few levels, as the wealth they've gained is sufficient to live out a comfortable life. Only a scant handful have the drive or necessity to continue on to higher levels, usually not because of wealth but for some other reason. Often those higher level adventurers gain positions of power and authority.