What's your alignment in real life?

[Sound of Azure]

True Neutral, with good and lawful tendancies. I've slipped from my neutral goodness in recent years, but am starting to bounce back in that direction again.

I'd probably be a worsipper of a deity like Xan-Yae or Zuoken, due to their emphasis on introspection and personal perfection. I think I'd like to be a worshipper of Pelor or Rao, though I wouldn't fit in with other worshippers of those types.

I don't think I have the dedication (or Wisdom) to be a cleric, though I hold my personal beliefs seriously.

 

[wayne62682]

The test I took said I was Chaotic Evil. However I think I'm closer to Lawful Neutral w/Evil tendencies, although I'm trying to be a better person. FYI it's LN/E because while I have a code of honor and personal beliefs, I find no problem with using any and all means (well, short of things like murder) to achieve my ambitions. I tend to not care about others if they aren't close to me, and I don't really have compassion. And, now that I'm probably going to be run out of town by an angry mob, I'll leave it at that

I don't know what deity I'd worship. None of them really appeal to me. If I wasn't leaning towards evil, Heironeous would probably be it, but maybe Hextor given that I'm on the other end of the stick right now.

 

[Celebrim]

I generally test LG, but such tests usually miss my strong anti-authoritarian streak and eclectic personal beliefs.

I personally strive to be NG, but I generally feel I miss the mark. I'm probably closer to neutral with good tendancies. I'd love to say I was good, but I'd have a hard time proving it from my day to day existance. If I'm good, why am I not actively seeking out more good things to do for others?

Most people I know are chaotic neutral with good tendancies. Most people I know think that they are neutral good, because they define whatever they believe or do as good.

 

[Jeff Wilder]

Like the plurality, I chose Neutral Good. I believe in the overall good of society significantly leavened with concern for and protection of the individual. Though I'm not an empathetic person, I'm capable of "empathy via logic," thus Good over Neutral. (I'm not at all a kind person, but I'm a steadfastly decent person.)

 

[was]

Neutral good..............

 

[Galethorn]

Neutral Good.

First, my explanation for the neutral. I have a generalized distrust of organizations, governmental, economic, religious, and 'other' On the flip-side, I like systems. Math, science, the way computers work, categorization.

Now, as for good...I'm big on small, day-to-day self-sacrifice. Except for the occasional case where I'm freezing cold and have just walked a mile in heavy rain, I yield bus seats to others. I make room in traffic. I've turned down work that I feel is unethical on several occasions. I give people more patience and good will than most would say they deserve. To me, everyone has redeeming qualities.

 

[Woas]

Lawful evil here. You peeps are too goody-goody

 

[I'm A Banana]

I don't think alignment can be applied to real people, who are much more complex in their motives and behaviors than even the most well role-played player character.

So.....lemon curry.

 

[Kunimatyu]

I'd prefer instincts and beliefs, but if I had to say, I'd go True Neutral with Good tendencies. I'd probably be more Good-aligned if I didn't feel that people considering themselves to be Good leads to quite a lot of evil in the world.

By that standard, clearly you guys are pretty evil.

 

[HeavenShallBurn]

Truthfully? I'm not really sure.

Somehow I end up with jagged little spikes radiating out toward different ends of the alignment spectrum. Maybe my ethics are running off something else and I'm a badly translated variant mechanic from another system

Some of the things I value would be considered Good and Lawful, but these are countered by other things that even I accept are by normal standards Evil. Maybe it all adds up to True Neutral?

#I'm intensely loyal to those I identify with, family, friends, unit members, to a lesser extent countrymen. Yet at the same time I'll accept or condone truly horrible things as long as they're performed strictly outside the group I identify with.
#I much prefer law rather than capriciousness in enforcement. Yet also believe that law must be as simple and straightforward as possible. I also believe that equity is the purpose of law, that no matter who you are within any single political entity there is precisely one set of laws that should apply to everyone.
#But that they exist solely as a minimum to ensure overall personal freedom. And that when laws or their enforcement no longer create this it becomes one's duty to at the first moment success is possible destroy utterly the corrupted system in order to instate a new uncorrupted one.
#I believe that it is absolutely imperative to help family, friends, and members of a larger group to which you belong even at your own cost. But not those who aren't your group if they want help they can look to their own relatives and associates.
#I believe that power exists to help people, and that as power increases so does the standard of behavior that must be demanded of those who wield it. Observing or simply reading news of power misused makes me truly angered and I believe misuse of power should be stomped on with vicious public executions of those who transgress against the people they were meant to protect in such a manner.