• The VOIDRUNNER'S CODEX is LIVE! Explore new worlds, fight oppressive empires, fend off fearsome aliens, and wield deadly psionics with this comprehensive boxed set expansion for 5E and A5E!

When Fantasy Meets Africa

The roaring success of the recent Black Panther film is another sign that fantasy worlds are changing. The fictional African country of Wakanda as portrayed in Marvel comic books has been isolated and stagnant, a common problem with "Othering" of non-white cultures. The plot of the film addresses its isolationist past and in doing so, blazes a trail for other fantasy universes in how they portray African-like nations.

Status
Not open for further replies.
The roaring success of the recent Black Panther film is another sign that fantasy worlds are changing. The fictional African country of Wakanda as portrayed in Marvel comic books has been isolated and stagnant, a common problem with "Othering" of non-white cultures. The plot of the film addresses its isolationist past and in doing so, blazes a trail for other fantasy universes in how they portray African-like nations.

[h=3]Marvel Deals With its "Other"[/h]Othering is a process in which other cultures are viewed through a biased lens of exoticism and isolationism. These cultures are not integrated into the world but are rather static, often amalgamating a region's various cultures into one homogeneous mass. The culture may be portrayed as never having advanced beyond what defines it as exotic.

Any world creation will likely be influence by the beliefs of the time, and many fantasy worlds -- Marvel's superhero universe included -- paint different cultures with broad strokes for white audiences as a form of shorthand. This is how we got Wakanda as a technologically-advanced culture that never fully engaged with the horrors of war that have rocked the world at large. As Nate Jones puts it:

It refuses to trade with other nations, though as one line in the movie makes clear, Wakandans are still able to consume American memes. As we see in a Western television broadcast in the movie, Wakanda is able to get away with this by masquerading as an impoverished third-world country, and since the country’s leadership refuses to take international aid, the rest of the world doesn’t ask too many questions.


The plot of Black Panther addresses this isolationism -- a byproduct of "othering" Wakanda as a a fictional nation in Africa -- head on, and makes it clear that the Marvel Cinematic Universe plans to integrate Wakanda into its narrative like any other nation. It's a bold choice that will likely change the static nature of Wakanda forever. Role-playing games face a similar dilemma.
[h=3]RPGs and Africa[/h]There hasn't been a great track record in nuanced representation of African nations in tabletop role-playing games. G.A. Barber uses Rifts Africa by Palladium as an example:

...with a decided lack of POC in the art, and the entire continent serves as a place for non-Africans to adventure in. There are 67 interior pictures in Rifts Africa, of which 54 depict non-Africans or landscape, and 13 depict Africans. The first picture with Africans in it has them acting as porters for a white game hunter. Four of the pictures (just under 25% of the pictures depicting Africans) depict Africans as monsters. None of the pictures show Africans using modern or futuristic technology or weapons, none of them are of Africans fighting monsters or “looking cool”. In a single book, ostensibly about Africa, only 19% of the pictures show Africans (omission), and the few depictions of them make it clear they are there as set dressing and nothing more (stereotypes and limited roles).


Dungeons & Dragons
has slowly, steadily, been addressing this issue. Fifth Edition has made efforts to be more inclusive, and that reflects in the diversity of character art. The lead image for the human race in the Player's Handbook is of a black woman. And yet, D&D still struggles with its broad strokes representation of African nations, as the controversy over the depiction of Chult demonstrates in Tomb of Annihilation:

Its point of inspiration is a campaign setting that, for years, has been written off as tone-deaf. The new adventure draws on D&D co-creator Gary Gygax’s adventure Tomb of Horrors and combines that with source material detailing Chult, a jungle peninsula first conceived of in a 1992 novel called The Ring of Winter, in which an adventurer travels to Chult’s dinosaur-filled wilderness seeking the eponymous artifact...The canonical Chultan peninsula finally congealed in a 1993 campaign setting as a dinosaur-infested jungle where heat wiped out even the strongest adventurers and insects carried fatal diseases. Reptilian races and undead skeletons dominate the land and humans live in tribal clusters and clans. Its major city, Mezro, “rivals some of the most ‘civilized’ population centers in Faerun,” the setting reads. Slavery is mentioned about 40 times. In D&D’s 3rd edition, it’s written that Chultan priest-kings worship “strange deities” in the city of Mezro. In D&D’s 4th edition, Chult is located on what’s called the “Savage Coast.” It’s said there that the city of Port Nyanzaru is controlled by foreign traders who often must defend against pirates. Mezro has collapsed. It just sank into the abyss. What remains is this: “Human civilization is virtually nonexistent here, though an Amnian colony and a port sponsored by Baldur’s Gate cling to the northern coasts, and a few tribes—some noble savages, others depraved cannibals—roam the interior.”


Tomb of Annihilation
works hard to create a more comprehensive African culture in Chult, but it may suffer from not enough nuance:

While many players I talked to enjoyed how the history and political structures of Chult were expanded in Tomb of Annihilation (and enjoyed the adventure’s plot generally), they were still unimpressed by its execution. Its setting is an amalgamation of African cultures, a trope frequent in 20th century media that flattens the dimensionality of human experiences on the continent, which contains hundreds of ethnic groups. There are nods to West African voodoo, Southern African click-based Khoisan languages, East African attire (like Kenyan kofia hats) and the jungle climate of Central Africa. Its fantasy setting dissolves “Africa” into an all-in-one cultural stew that comes off as a little detached, sources I interviewed said.


Is it possible to depict a more nuanced fantasy Africa? Nyambe: African Adventures for 3.5 D&D, by Christopher Dolunt, offers some hope:

My motivation for creating Nyambe was simple. Africa was a major part of the Earth that has little or no representation in fantasy literature, let alone RPGs. When it does appear, it usually follows the pulp fiction model: steaming jungles, bloodthirsty cannibals, and dark gods long forgotten by the civilized races. Of course, historical Africa was nothing like that, so my goal for Nyambe was to create a fantasy version of Africa based on the actual history and mythology of Africa, rather than previous fantasy depictions. So, I went about taking snippets of history or myth, and twisting them, adding fantasy elements or changing specifics to make them fit into an OGL world.

[h=3]Now What?[/h]Wizards of the Coast made considerable strides in increasing D&D's diverse representation and transitioning Chult from conquered land to fantasy nation, but there's still work to do. As more people of color play D&D, the game will need to change to accommodate its players' diverse views. With Black Panther leading the way, here's hoping future game designers will take note.

Mike "Talien" Tresca is a freelance game columnist, author, communicator, and a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to http://amazon.com. You can follow him at Patreon.
 

log in or register to remove this ad

Michael Tresca

Michael Tresca

Staccat0

First Post
Muslims today, benefit from centuries of Islamic imperialism that perpetrated violent totalitarianism and ethnic cleansing of aboriginal peoples.

But where is the outcry against Muslim ethnicities?
Hopefully in Muslim majority nations where it belongs? I doubt many of us have a vested interest in improving our children's lives by talking about that so why bother? Just to deflect with transparent whataboutisms?

There is nothing punishing or racist about acknowledging why other people have had disadvantages historically and how that benefitted people like me. It's just something built into our society and to ignore it is cowardice. Attacking other people's culture's as a defense from our own glass house would be childish.

The racism is directed against European ethnicities, only. Irrational racism. Unethical racism.
You'll be fine.
 

log in or register to remove this ad

Imaro

Legend
Currently, I am enjoying the show, Black Lightning, it is a superhero scifi that takes place in a black community. It has only one significant white character, the ‘token white’. But the story is sympathetic to him, and treats him as an equal. He and the superhero are partners of a kind.

An other scifi that takes place in a black community is ... heh, I forget what it is called, I stopped watching it. It annoyed me. It treats the few white characters with little sympathy, placing them in subservient and/or silly roles. It comes across as hateful, racist, and I need not watch it.

To reverse the roles of injustice, is still the same injustice. No one heals. Nothing gets better. It is the same kind of hate and racism. Reversal causes the same dysfunctional paradigm to persist.



Comparing these shows, ‘authority’ and personal agency turns out to be a vital requirement for portraying a minority ethnic group. In this black community, the white is the minority ethnic group.

I'd really love to know what the second show you are referencing in this post is since, at least if it's American tv, what you' re describing (whites in a subservient and silly role compared to minorities) is so rare as to mark this setup (if accurately described) as a rare anomaly. You've certainly piqued my curiosity... Any chance you'll remember the name?
 

Yaarel

🇮🇱He-Mage
Archeologically, slavery has been around for thousands of years, since the Bronze Age. It evolved in a combination of people using labor to pay off financial debts and people being captured in war and coerced to do labor. The lines between these two categories often blurred. Slavery is still going on today. An estimated 40,000,000 humans are currently involved in slavery today. The slaves are mostly in Muslim nations, and mostly women.

Slavery is as old as civilization. Just about every ethnic group from China to Norway to Saudia to Nigeria has seen the institution of slavery. Even in the Bible, as old as the ages that it describes are, slavery is already a fact of life.

It is a white ethnicity that was the first, and at that time the only ethnicity, to abolish slavery. Namely the United Kingdom.

Ending the institution of slavery is something the ‘white’ British ethnic groups can be proud.
 

Yaarel

🇮🇱He-Mage
I'd really love to know what the second show you are referencing in this post is since, at least if it's American tv, what you' re describing (whites in a subservient and silly role compared to minorities) is so rare as to mark this setup (if accurately described) as a rare anomaly. You've certainly piqued my curiosity... Any chance you'll remember the name?

I remembered the name after I posted, Superstition. Its subtle racism is a shame too, because otherwise, it covers subject matter that would have found interesting. A show about magic is always a plus!

By the way, in this show, the whites are the ‘minority’. The blacks are the defining ‘majority’ and the dominant ethnic group.
 

Gradine

The Elephant in the Room (she/her)
Archeologically, slavery has been around for thousands of years, since the Bronze Age. It evolved in a combination of people using labor to pay off financial debts and people being captured in war and coerced to do labor. The lines between these two categories often blurred. Slavery is still going on today. An estimated 40,000,000 humans are currently involved in slavery today. The slaves are mostly in Muslim nations, and mostly women.

Slavery is as old as civilization. Just about every ethnic group from China to Norway to Saudia to Nigeria has seen the institution of slavery. Even in the Bible, as old as the ages that it describes are, slavery is already a fact of life.

It is a white ethnicity that was the first, and at that time the only ethnicity, to abolish slavery. Namely the United Kingdom.

Ending the institution of slavery is something the ‘white’ British ethnic groups can be proud.

There is a significant difference between slavery as it has been practiced by various cultures and civilizations over the millennia and even indentured servitude the very specific type of chattel slavery practiced predominantly upon Africans (as well as occasionally native populations of the Americas, though that fell out of practice fairly early on) by predominantly European colonizing forces in the Americas. To compare it to what the ancient Greeks and Romans were doing is to betray a lack of knowledge about those differences.

And yes yes, African peoples participated in and benefited from chattel slavery as well, nobody denies that. But as been pointed out repeatedly, this isn't about assigning blame for what one's ancestors did. It's about addressing the legacies of those actions and how they impact people today. Because slavery, Jim Crow, segregation, redlining; these may not be in practice any longer (though in practice, schools today are more segregatd now than at any point since at least the 1970's), but combined with education funding being tied to property values, and redlining segregating neighborhoods in ways that haven't allowed those excluded to build and pass on the kinds of equity others have had access to, we live in a society where we do not have true equality of opportunity. And social mobility has been on the decline for a while now.

So no, nobody has to atone for the sins of their fathers. They should, however, recognize the significant head starts centuries of systemic racism have given most of us that others haven't had access to, and I believe we have a responsibility to do what we can to correct that. Not to give up what we have, but to find some way to share it. To this point, nobody's found a silver bullet solution to that, but I don't think there's going to be any. It's going to take a lot of hard work and a lot of time to make frustratingly incremental progress. But, as the say, the arc of history bends towards justice. So I'm hopeful.
 

Yaarel

🇮🇱He-Mage
There is a significant difference between slavery as it has been practiced by various cultures and civilizations over the millennia and even indentured servitude the very specific type of chattel slavery practiced predominantly upon Africans (as well as occasionally native populations of the Americas, though that fell out of practice fairly early on) by predominantly European colonizing forces in the Americas. To compare it to what the ancient Greeks and Romans were doing is to betray a lack of knowledge about those differences.

And yes yes, African peoples participated in and benefited from chattel slavery as well, nobody denies that. But as been pointed out repeatedly, this isn't about assigning blame for what one's ancestors did. It's about addressing the legacies of those actions and how they impact people today. Because slavery, Jim Crow, segregation, redlining; these may not be in practice any longer (though in practice, schools today are more segregatd now than at any point since at least the 1970's), but combined with education funding being tied to property values, and redlining segregating neighborhoods in ways that haven't allowed those excluded to build and pass on the kinds of equity others have had access to, we live in a society where we do not have true equality of opportunity. And social mobility has been on the decline for a while now.

So no, nobody has to atone for the sins of their fathers. They should, however, recognize the significant head starts centuries of systemic racism have given most of us that others haven't had access to, and I believe we have a responsibility to do what we can to correct that. Not to give up what we have, but to find some way to share it. To this point, nobody's found a silver bullet solution to that, but I don't think there's going to be any. It's going to take a lot of hard work and a lot of time to make frustratingly incremental progress. But, as the say, the arc of history bends towards justice. So I'm hopeful.

Are you actually saying that various Muslim customs today are practicing a ‘benign’ ‘compassionate’ form of slavery. Because that would be idiotic, as well as unethical.
 


Yaarel

🇮🇱He-Mage
Gradine, your comments come across as racism.

You seem to *only* direct criticism against the socalled ‘white’ ‘race’.

Even when you acknowledge other groups as equally responsible, you seem to omit any criticism against other groups.

It seems to me, you are indulging in an unethical practice of ‘selective enforcement’.

I dare you to criticize any other ethnic group with equal dedication, besides ‘white’ ethnic groups.
 

Gradine

The Elephant in the Room (she/her)
Are you actually saying that various Muslim customs today are practicing a ‘benign’ ‘compassionate’ form of slavery. Because that would be idiotic, as well as unethical.

No. Not at all. Let me reread what I wrote... yeah, no, definitely did not say any of that. I'm a little mind-boggled how you came to that conclusion.

But let's set aside that strawman for a second and talk about what I... think(?) you're trying to say here, which is to say "but look at what they're doing over there!" Which is a rhetorical device I thought we'd all grown out of in middle school. But to indulge you: what I'm talking about is racial and other forms of systemic inequality that exist, currently, right now, today, in the United States, which is where I live, due to centuries of legal practices that have alternatively relegated black people and other racial minorities to less-than-human, less-than-full-citizens, and not-deserving-of-the same-opportunities-as-white-people.

Now, does the sorts of oppression that occurs in other countries and other cultures currently concern me? Yes, yes it does. But, seeing as how I don't belong to those cultures, it also is not my responsibility to step in and tell them how to run things. Fortunately, literally every nation in the world has home-grown justice movements that are working to correct the oppressions within their own communities. And I do feel a responsibility to do what I can to support those movements (which is, admittedly, not much), but there's a world of a difference between supporting local women's rights movements in Muslim-run countries and us, as Americans, marching in and telling them what they ought to be doing. Because... our track record isn't exactly the greatest ourselves.
 

Gradine

The Elephant in the Room (she/her)
Slavery is happening today. In Africa.

Depending on how you want to define sex trafficking, you could make the argument that similar forms of slavery are happening today in the United Freaking States of America.

It's not that I don't see your point. But saying everyone else is crappier than us does not mean it's okay for us to be okay with just being a better form of crappy. Especially if you seem to want us to be some sort of world police to tell other countries how to handle their business, we need to be doing a better job of it ourselves first, don't you think?
 

Status
Not open for further replies.

Voidrunner's Codex

Remove ads

Voidrunner's Codex

Remove ads

Top