Where’s The Beastmaster Roleplaying Game? Part 1

Remember 1982’s The Beastmaster? Why don't we have an official RPG yet?
Remember 1982’s The Beastmaster? That film along with several others heralded the sword-and-sorcery, Conan-xploitation movie craze of the 1980s. With its swords, sorcery, “barbarian” loincloths, and the equivalent of the Dungeons & Dragons’ spell Speak With Animals – only treated as a major power instead of a magical novelty – The Beastmaster was a gamer go-to during the first decade of D&D. Despite its recognition among gamers at that time, there’s never been an official TTRPG. Considering The Beastmaster’s place alongside Conan the Barbarian, Deathstalker, and Hawk the Slayer during the era of Advanced Dungeons & Dragons, why isn’t there an official The Beastmaster Roleplaying Game or sourcebook for your gaming table?

Dar The Beastmaster (Marc Singer) & Ruh.png

What is the Beastmster?​

Directed by Don Coscarelli of Phantasm fame and starring Marc Singer, Tanya Roberts, John Amos, and Rip Torn, the story of The Beastmaster involves Dar, a warrior who can communicate with animals, seeking revenge for his murdered tribe. The quest for vengeance leads Dar (Marc Singer), and his animal companions to meet Kiri (Tanya Roberts) and Seth (John Amos) as he hunts the evil wizard Maax (Rip Torn). Loosely based on Alice "Andre" Norton’s 1959 novel, The Beast Master, the movies take very little from that novel, mostly the ability to communicate with animals. For a B-movie, the director and cast were more notable than many of their contemporaries in the sword-and-sorcery craze of the 1980s.

If you partook in the slew of Conan-xploitation, fantasy movies from that decade, you knew of The Beastmaster. The film had a modest box office, yet it became a gamer staple, which begs the question, why was this movie famous? In the 1980s, two American television channels were known by mocking monikers: HBO’s letters were joked to stand for "Hey, Beastmaster's On" while TBS signified "The Beastmaster Station". In other words, The Beastmaster played on those channels so often you’d think that the broadcasters got paid every time they ran the movie instead of the reverse. The constant re-runs provided the film with a cult following.

Along with Conan the Barbarian and Roger Corman’s entries, The Beastmaster formed the foundation of the 1980s modest-budget, sword-and-sorcery subgenre. The Beastmaster had two sequels: 1991’s Beastmaster 2: Through the Portal of Time and 1996’s NBC TV-movie, Beastmaster III: The Eye of Braxus, plus a 3-season TV series and Richard A. Knaak (Dragonlance: The Legend of Huma and Dragonlance: Kaz the Minotaur) and Sylvio Tabet’s (Producer of The Beastmaster and Director of Beastmaster 2) 2009 sequel novel titled Beastmaster Myth. In 2020, director Don Coscarelli and screenwriter Paul Pepperman reclaimed the copyright to their original The Beastmaster screenplay. All of that is to say, there’s plenty of The Beastmaster to touch on, yet no tabletop RPG. Considering its decade of notoriety coinciding with Advanced Dungeons & Dragons First Edition, why aren’t fans playing characters that talk to animals and wear loincloths for armor… er, more like The Beastmaster-specific versions of those character types?

The Beastmaster Soundtrack Album.png

More About the Beastmaster​

For those that haven’t seen The Beastmaster, Vinegar Syndrome, distributor of Don Coscarelli’s most recent edition of the original film, gives this synopsis:

“When he was a baby, Dar (Marc Singer, In The Cold Of The Night, TV's ‘V’) and his royal family were cursed by an all-powerful wizard named Maax (Rip Torn, Men in Black) to prevent him from rightfully ascending as the leader of his people. Stolen from his parents and about to be sacrificed, Dar is rescued by a kind villager who raises him as his own. While training with his adopted father, Dar realizes the curse has left him with a unique gift: the ability to telepathically communicate with all forms of animal life. Years later, Maax returns with the help of a violent band of marauders known as the Jun to all but wipe out Dar's tribe, leaving him to fend for himself. Accompanied by his animal and human friends, Dar sets out on a quest of vengeance to destroy Maax and the Jun, and return peace to the land before it's too late.”

Want a few reviews from gamers? Then check out Alex Wolfe’s series on The Beastmaster:
The Beastmaster Vinegar Syndrom DVD Cover.png

"I'll Do It Myself!"​

There isn’t an official adaptation, but does The Beastmaster need its own game? Couldn’t another system cover the requirements?

"INSERT GAME already has all of the rules that you’d need to play INSERT FRANCHISE" was a common discussion during the Kickstarter campaign for the Altered Carbon RPG. Before and after the Altered Carbon Kickstarter, some gamers argued that Eclipse Phase could cover everything Altered Carbon’s mythology required. The same proscription was cited when debating the need for The Terminator RPG. In theory, the simulation could be detailed using most cyberpunk or superhero RPGs. Despite the debate, these projects found backers through crowdfunding and turned a profit. How? Because a unified, focused game has inherent advantages over hacking an existing system. By focusing on each property’s core elements, The Terminator RPG and Altered Carbon RPG eliminated narrative outliers, rule discrepancies, and GM homebrewing that would result from bending a generalized ruleset to work with an existing property. In addition, the art in the rulebooks fit the feel of the world, which is a huge plus.

That said, regarding The Beastmaster, there’s an argument for an existing system over a unique system. Why? Because D&D debuted in 1974 and The Beastmaster in 1982. D&D took time to roll out from its base near the Great Lakes to touch players across the world. There’s some alignment with players discovering the game and the movie at nearly the same time making the film a contemporary example of sword-and-sorcery for early D&D enthusiasts. That connection implies that many sessions of D&D in the mid- to late-80s had a player that wanted to take the role of a beastmaster. While there wasn’t official TSR support for a beastmaster, elements of that class existed in the rules and spirit of D&D. Therefore, the DM could homebrew some options and – BAM! – the player’s character was commanding ferret thieves. This worked until the player wanted one attack for their beastmaster, one for their panther, one for their eagle, and two for the pair of ferrets each round. That unbalanced and slowed the encounter, and led to attempts to reign in the OP elements of the homebrew, which resulted in DM and player frustration at the number of dead ferrets per session.

Alternately, there’s the Dungeons & Dragons Fifth Edition (2014) Ranger subclass called “Beast Master.” In the context of this article that sounds like a stand-in, but the subclass comes with a built-in flaw: the wider world of D&D. If you’re playing a game based on The Beastmaster, that’s the focus, the adventures of this Ranger-like Barbarian. In D&D, the focus is the range of gaming options: wizards, clerics, dragonborn, and all of the other bigger, badder classes and subclasses that take the spotlight off of the setting and premise of The Beastmaster. That is to say, your 5e version of The Beastmaster is unlikely to feel like the source material.

For the best The Beastmaster experience, creating or modifying an existing system offers detailed, mythology-specific mechanics that will play better at the table. For the sake of game balance and narrative purity, putting beastmasters into their own world is ideal.

To Be Continued...​

We'll continue our discussion in the next article (published next week), including what TTRPG to use, if such a hypothetical game could make money, and which publisher might be the first to get the license.

Egg Embry participates in the OneBookShelf Affiliate Program, Noble Knight Games’ Affiliate Program, Kobold Press Affiliate Program, and is an Amazon Associate. These programs provide advertising fees by linking to DriveThruRPG, Noble Knight Games, Kobold Press, and Amazon.
 

log in or register to remove this ad

Egg Embry

Egg Embry

It's old hat now, but before the explosion of Star Wars in media, there were several prior influential franchises on movies, and one of those waves was Tarzan from the 30s through the 60s. Drawn from Edgar Rice Burroughs' stories (but significantly different in that Tarzan speaks normally in the books but no in the movies). Dozens of imitators sprang up, including "female Tarzans." Virtually every "friend of animals and raised with them" sort of trope was likely inspired by the Tarzan movie: Tarzan - Wikipedia

That said, Beastmaster has a different pedigree due its own sci-if origins (I'm not familiar enough with the book to determine if Tarzan influenced the plot directly).
Theres no Tarzan influence in Beastmaster, its very much Conan with an animal twist, part of the whole Barbarian hero movies coming out at the time
 

log in or register to remove this ad


Theres no Tarzan influence in Beastmaster, its very much Conan with an animal twist, part of the whole Barbarian hero movies coming out at the time

The actual original source was, however, a pair of SF novels, and the only real resemblence is the (approximate) construction of the animal team.

(I'm still boggled than none of Andre Norton's novels ever made it to the screen in a somewhat more authentic form (though there might be some zeerust related problems with her SF output these days.)
 

Yes Im talking specifically of the movie inspiration being a "barbarian hero" clone, they even give Dar the "they destroyed my whole village" origin.

I guess someone was wanting to cash in on the Barbarian trend od the time and remembered that obscure story about a warrior with a big cat, eagle and two rodents

whereas the books are .. different
 


I loved hte beastmaster books as a teen, the movie not so much

And good question why no Norton made it to the screen, at least afaik.
There is a lot of great SF (Poul Anderson, Larry Niven, non-Earthsea Le Guin, etc), and great fiction generally, that has never been adapted. Instead the same old stories get done over and over and over. I suspect that it's because most of the people making films only watch films rather than reading books.
 

That said, Beastmaster has a different pedigree due its own sci-if origins (I'm not familiar enough with the book to determine if Tarzan influenced the plot directly).
As pointed out, the movie was mostly influenced by Conan. However, REH was influenced by Burroughs (and visa versa possibly, he was earlier, but still active when REH was writing), so I think its fair to say there is an indirect influence.

It's a case in point that most movie and TV versions of Tarzan owe more more to the early movies than they do to the novels.
 

There is a lot of great SF (Poul Anderson, Larry Niven, non-Earthsea Le Guin, etc), and great fiction generally, that has never been adapted. Instead the same old stories get done over and over and over. I suspect that it's because most of the people making films only watch films rather than reading books.

Some of those I can get requiring more effort to get right--Le Guin requires considerable nuance for example--but Norton's output was mostly adventure SF and fantasy with some romantic elements (particularly in the latter). You'd think it'd be exactly what they'd be looking for.
 

Some of those I can get requiring more effort to get right--Le Guin requires considerable nuance for example--but Norton's output was mostly adventure SF and fantasy with some romantic elements (particularly in the latter). You'd think it'd be exactly what they'd be looking for.
Poul Anderson’s Polsotechnic League stories aren’t particularly nuanced space adventures.
 

There is a lot of great SF (Poul Anderson, Larry Niven, non-Earthsea Le Guin, etc), and great fiction generally, that has never been adapted. Instead the same old stories get done over and over and over. I suspect that it's because most of the people making films only watch films rather than reading books.
I suspect we are deceiving ourselves if we think anything we love is too obscure for those working in the film industry. Fiction is their bag, just as strongly (or more) as it is to us in the nerd-o-sphere. Certainly there were people in love with Asimov and Bradbury, yet up until streaming channels started mining things for content we had all of: Bicentennial Man(/the Positronic Man), I Robot (with Beastmaster-level minimal relation to the book), Fahrenheit 451, Something Wicked This Way Comes, and a TV adaptation of the Martian Chronicles. I suspect there are other issues. Most of them related to when they came out, what sci fi looked like at the time, and perceived draw.

A lot of these novels peaked in popularity back when most visual sci fi was of the 'Attack of the 50-foot _______' variety, interspersed with 'Rocketship to the Planet of <set that fits on a soundstage>' budget-friendly films and tv shows. Occasional speculative fiction/novel adaptations that didn't require many expensive special effects (like Colossus: The Forbin Project, Logan's Run or The Andromeda Strain) came out, but most did not set the box office on fire. By the time Star Wars, Terminator, Jurassic Park and other movies made sci fi big business, the books in question were advertiser's target demographic's parent's favorite novels*.
*how many possessive-form nouns can I string together?
 

Recent & Upcoming Releases

Enchanted Trinkets Complete

Remove ads

Enchanted Trinkets Complete

Recent & Upcoming Releases

Remove ads

Top