Why not?Hmmh... not the game's fault if the paladin can always smite and rest...
Why not?Hmmh... not the game's fault if the paladin can always smite and rest...
I think that "time" was just 3.5. And Pathfinder too.I remember a time in 3.5 where someone could summon a "pet" that made the Fighter look like a joke. The caster could then go on to do other things while also controlling a creature that was better than a few other party members.
Not only that, but the 5e PHB literally says in its quick build section to place your highest stat in Wisdom, followed by Strength or Constitution. It's hard to take an accusation of bad faith play seriously when the printed directions in the book give you min-max advice! (There is literally no advice in the quick build section about using personality as a guide to a stat assignment. And the Chapter 1 section on assigning stats only uses a[MENTION=6855234]CTurbo[/MENTION]: I've got no strong view on what optimisation, min/max etc should be taken to mean, or whether or not they're inherently pejorative. But your PC seems fine to me. I wouldn't normally expect a player to add stat boosts to stats they don't see as very important to their PC.
Well, if the paladin smiting and then long-resting breaks the game, one might expect that the game would not permit it.Why should it?
Well, if the paladin smiting and then long-resting breaks the game, one might expect that the game would not permit it.
I dunno, I hear cancer is pretty bad.I completely 100,000% agree with this. There is nothing worse than wildly unbalanced characters.

(Dungeons & Dragons)
Rulebook featuring "high magic" options, including a host of new spells.