Which of these would you like to see in 2015 from WotC?

[Morrus]

In 2015 we only have a couple of things announced so far. Which of the items in this poll would you most like to see from WotC in 2015?

 

[Queer Venger]

OGL is a given, not necessarily something I immediately want the most. The e-tools while super handy, for me are not essential or needed at this time, the game is not so complex (with just the core 3 books) that I need tools to help me sort it out (as opposed to PF which has a veritable library of sups). So I voted FRCG, it is really something I want the most (and need) to run my games, more so than anything else at the moment. While I do have the 3e FRCG, it will be cool to have an official 5e campaign companion since this is where the official modules and AL are being set in. I can wait for GH, DS, et al, after 2016-17.

 

[Henrix]

I don't really feel I need the magazines in print. Though it would be nice.

But I really want Dragon and Dungeon, in the right hands.

 

[Umbrathys]

I voted a book of new rules. I like some of the fan-made psionic rules I have seen, but I would really like to see a comprehensive psionic rules book for 5e from Wizards. Somebody go kidnap Steve Winter. I'm sure he could give us 2e feel with 5e rules

 

[Gnarl45]

I really want an OGL. WoTC does not know how to write a good adventure...

 

[Riley]

I would vote "Other", if that was an option:

I want Dragon and Dungeon back. PDF eMagazines would be acceptable; print will never happen.

I love adventures and want more of 'em, but I'm not a fan of adventure paths.

 

[Umbran]

Adventures, path or otherwise, WotC or third party through licensing. I'm not picky.

 

[Jeff Carlsen]

I don't specifically desire Dungeon and Dragon in print, or even two separate products. I just want there to be a place for regular and varied content from a wide variety of authors.

Ultimately, I'd prefer a monthly 96 or 128 page softcover book that includes a wide variety of content.

 

[BoldItalic]

OGL because that will allow third parties to produce more adventure paths, settings, monsters, tools and so on, than WotC will be able to do in-house. It's the enabler for all the others.

 

[pming]

Hiya!

I would have voted for "Other"...if it was a choice.

My "Other" would be to see them do a roll-out of 1e-style adventure modules. Basically take the old 1e modules and do EVERYTHING like that, but for 5e rules. As an example, take L1: The Secret of Bone Hill. Now just sub all the 1e stuff with 5e stuff. Done. Same layout, style, etc. (re: no glossy pages, no full-color art, unattached cover, about 30 pages long, etc). See what they did with Hoard of the Dragon Queen? Pretty much do the opposite of that.

^_^

Paul L. Ming