GreyLord
Legend
This is actually somewhat tongue in cheek...so don't take the title all THAT seriously. This isn't REALLY an AD&D vs. other editions thing...it's more of a discussion on the why's and what's of AC in 3e and 5e.
AD&D allows the full DEX modifier.
I found it ridiculous how 3e decided that your DEX modifier to AC was limited due to the armor type. Even more so with 5e.
Why did they even start this trend (Back in 3e) of limiting the amount of DEX modifier you could have to your AC depending on the type of armor you wore?
Ridiculous assumptions regarding armor? Fallacious views of how mobile knights were?
Anyone know the answer?
Anyone share my view that the full DEX modifier should be allowed to be added to AC regardless of armor type. The only thing that happens by not allowing this is reducing Warrior efficiency. People already criticize the Warrior types for being weaker at higher levels...let them have that DEX bonus (if they even have it) to their AC!
AD&D allows the full DEX modifier.
I found it ridiculous how 3e decided that your DEX modifier to AC was limited due to the armor type. Even more so with 5e.
Why did they even start this trend (Back in 3e) of limiting the amount of DEX modifier you could have to your AC depending on the type of armor you wore?
Ridiculous assumptions regarding armor? Fallacious views of how mobile knights were?
Anyone know the answer?
Anyone share my view that the full DEX modifier should be allowed to be added to AC regardless of armor type. The only thing that happens by not allowing this is reducing Warrior efficiency. People already criticize the Warrior types for being weaker at higher levels...let them have that DEX bonus (if they even have it) to their AC!