Me, too. But unfortunately, I think WOTC moving to digital is a symptom, not the cause, if you take my meaning. I love books, but a digital pad or a monitor screen is more cost effective and ecologically sound for publishers across the board, if they can get readers to accept them. Especially for periodicals.carmachu said:Print form is important to me.
You may be right, the best may yet come. But, it is the end of an era. Dragon holds the record (as far as I know) for the longest running gaming magazine. I believe that White Dwarf is a close second and will now take up that mantle, but . . . I still find myself a little sad over this.Torm said:Put simply, I have doubts about this "End of an Era" people keep talking about. Cheer up, people - the best is yet to be.![]()
carmachu said:One example of a sucessful online magazine, and many more failures. The odds dont play well in WotC favor you realize?
Jürgen Hubert said:Two, actually - the Journal of the Traveller's Aid Society (also run by SJGames) also still seems to be active.
And WotC has a target audience that is at least an order of magnitude larger than that of SJGames. If they follow the same business model, the odds of their success aren't too bad.
And here's another idea: SJGames offers Pyramid subscribers the opportunity to playtest their new products - a number of interested subscribers (usually 40 or so) will be able to download the raw manuscript and then comment on it on a closed mailing list. If WotC does the same, then the sheer amount of people trying to get an advance peek (plus a free playtest copy if they are accepted) should be sufficient in themselves to finance this venture...