Liquidsabre
Explorer
Thanee said:
By Rod or Arcane Prep feat?
-
NOW LIVE! Into the Woods--new character species, eerie monsters, and haunting villains to populate the woodlands of your D&D games.
Why Wizards are better than Sorcerers, and other stories
- Thread starter MerricB
- Start date
By Rod or Arcane Prep feat?
Monks are better than sorcerors or wizards
Monks can womp the hello out of a sorceror or a wizard. Especially when the wizard loses his spell book and the sorceror only knows magic missile, mage armor, and sleep.
HOWEVER, a Sorceror with the Vow of Poverty is almost as powerful as the aforementioned Monk with the Vow of Poverty.
But, In all honesty, who'd wanna play a Sorceror who couldn't accumulate wealth?!
Sparxmith
Monks can womp the hello out of a sorceror or a wizard. Especially when the wizard loses his spell book and the sorceror only knows magic missile, mage armor, and sleep.
HOWEVER, a Sorceror with the Vow of Poverty is almost as powerful as the aforementioned Monk with the Vow of Poverty.
But, In all honesty, who'd wanna play a Sorceror who couldn't accumulate wealth?!
Sparxmith
just the same.My class is obviously superior to your class.
My class has a strong historical basis, and is easily envisioned in such a way that it can recreate fictional archetypes. Your class is silly.
My class has many powerful mechanical class benefits, all of which are extremely useful in the game. Your class is only really excellent in one or two areas, which does not make up for fundamental mediocrity in other areas, and which is really not that important to the game.
My class has many special abilities that work well when used in tactical ways, whereas your class lacks subtlety and can be defeated with a very simple tactic.
My class is balanced, based on my anecdotal evidence, whereas your class is nerfed in some areas and broken in other areas, based on anecdotal evidence.
My class is one of the most popular classes among famous entertainers and celebrities who play the game, while your class is often played by antisocial misfits, some of whom later commit crimes.
Your class suffers from a limitation that my class does not suffer from.
The rules relating to my class' special ability are simple and well-supported, while the rules relating to your class' special ability are vague, contradictory, and open to abuse or DM mismanagement.
The limitations of my class are only limitations when viewed as such by those with a lack of imagination, such as the hackneyed backers of your class.
In sum, I have concretely demonstrated the superiority of my class to your class.
My class has a strong historical basis, and is easily envisioned in such a way that it can recreate fictional archetypes. Your class is silly.
My class has many powerful mechanical class benefits, all of which are extremely useful in the game. Your class is only really excellent in one or two areas, which does not make up for fundamental mediocrity in other areas, and which is really not that important to the game.
My class has many special abilities that work well when used in tactical ways, whereas your class lacks subtlety and can be defeated with a very simple tactic.
My class is balanced, based on my anecdotal evidence, whereas your class is nerfed in some areas and broken in other areas, based on anecdotal evidence.
My class is one of the most popular classes among famous entertainers and celebrities who play the game, while your class is often played by antisocial misfits, some of whom later commit crimes.
Your class suffers from a limitation that my class does not suffer from.
The rules relating to my class' special ability are simple and well-supported, while the rules relating to your class' special ability are vague, contradictory, and open to abuse or DM mismanagement.
The limitations of my class are only limitations when viewed as such by those with a lack of imagination, such as the hackneyed backers of your class.
In sum, I have concretely demonstrated the superiority of my class to your class.
Elrik_DarkFury
First Post
Forgot somthin.
Druids and their little friends are flammeable too!Amongst others phb and exalted deeds are flammable too-what you don't like you burn(simple but practical)
And don't forget that inflammeable stuff can be disintergrated too.(Disintergrate:Best spell of the game).
Oh,and meat-wands really really suck.suck. and suck.-
________________
The Wizard
Druids and their little friends are flammeable too!Amongst others phb and exalted deeds are flammable too-what you don't like you burn(simple but practical)
And don't forget that inflammeable stuff can be disintergrated too.(Disintergrate:Best spell of the game).
Oh,and meat-wands really really suck.suck. and suck.-
________________
The Wizard
Sejs
First Post
Shoot you with a cannon. Pirates are known to do that sort of thing from time to time.
On the other hand, the monk/pirate could have a magical pegleg and get weapon bonuses and stuff and still have it be considdered a natural weapon for his monking. Same with a hook hand! The benefits of a missing eye are still being worked out, however.
Barbarians are cool because they're immune to explosive runes.
Sorcerers are cool because they can drink a potion of eagle's spelendor and get more spells then and there.
Druids are cool because they know how to make their own granola and birkenstocks.
Monkies are cool because they mate in the jungle, however, Robots can replicate in a factory. Then they both have a giant rumble.
Similar Threads
