Wishlist do 5 ed

[Umbran]

Hahahahah hahahahahaha hahahahah oh my god wait you're serious.

Please allow me to make this clear: We expect you to treat your fellow posters with respect. If you cannot, we expect you to hold off clicking the submit button until such time as you can.

This post fails in that regard. I strongly suggest you change your tone.

It should go without saying that we expect others to now ignore the fact that Darwinism here has been boorish. He's been informed of his misstep. If he continues down this disrespectful route, please report him rather than argue with him.

Thanks, all, for your attention.

 

[Glyfair]

1) Reduce the level cap to 15. Actually, the campaings rarely reach the 20, the 30 ia quite impossible. It would take about 4 years. So, if level cap is 15, people can reach the end game. Plus, DM can use more monsters per level (total dividid per 15, not 30)

I disagree, especially the "end game" part. I got interested in RPGs primarily because there was no mandated "end game." That's been part of their attraction.

Sure, the length and feel of the various levels can and has changed through the years. I wouldn't mind if they experimented with that. Setting a hard cap, I have to disagree.

 

[TheAuldGrump]

Well, I think Paizo have lots of advances too. Somehow, just play table RPG is a kind of nostalgy and I think that expansion of that Hobby comes by that people show it to friends. We are in wow times and spontaneous new public tends to play in computer (wow, D3, etc)

The wow like model of 4e splint the market. Now the name Pathfinder is know. So it is an oportinity to Paizo too. If they do a PF 2e really good, they can get more people from 4e and this people will show their friends PF, not DnD




---
I am here: Google Maps

To a limited extent that has already begun - one of the kids in my Tweens 'n' Teens game (in two weeks just a teens game, as the last one hits thirteen) is starting to run Pathfinder, which means five out of six of the kids are now in two games. Makes me proud. I run every other week, he is taking the off week, and his sister is thinking of running a game too.

The Auld Grump

 

[TheAuldGrump]

So, a guy who plays 4E and Pathfinder is a Half-angry-nerd?

Monte Cook's back to Wotc, IMO, is a clear signal that, yes, Wizards is concerned about player base split and will try to get some people back. And this is not about edition wars or nerdrages or wow or whatever... it's just what a smart company would do.

Thou art but mad north-north-west: when the wind is southerly ye know a hawk from a handsaw.

The Auld Grump - we're all mad here. I'm mad, you're. *Disappears, leaving only his smile.*

 

[Grazzt]

<snipped>


If you want to play a game where pc death doesn't matter, play a game where the pcs don't die. TPKs don't ruin campaigns, whiny players that can't accept the consequences of their actions (up to a TPK) and crappy dms that don't run enjoyable games do.

Pretty much agree with everything Jester said...esp the part above. Not the game's fault if character's die.

Remove death from the game, and somewhere out there you'll get this "I run up and stab the dragon with my +3 spoon of Froot Looping. What? Yeah, I know I'm at -2000 hp, so what?"