Wizard's red dragon

bolen

First Post
I have the black dragon Mini and I really like it but I did not like the red one at all. It is nearly $100 and it seems like it does not have that much detail on it. I see it won the origin award. Am I in the minority on this one.

At gen-con the put a red LED in its mouth and that added some character to the mini but still $100? :confused:
 

log in or register to remove this ad


It's a bland pose. I didn't like the black either. Dragons should stalk like tigers and lunge like raptors and soar like . . . raptors (the other kind), not sit on their asses like that old dated mural of dinosaurs that used to be in the natural history museum.
 





Kunimatyu said:
If you're not a fan of the Gargantuan+ WotC dragons, give the McFarlane Dragons (www.spawn.com) a look -- some are quite exceptional, and much more reasonable (12.99 last I checked).
Holy. Effin'. Crap. I've heard of the McFarlane Dragons before, but for some reason this is the first time I actually followed through to see pictures of them. $12.99? Are you serious?! Dear god, I must own some of those. Those are gorgeous!
 

RangerWickett said:
It's a bland pose. I didn't like the black either. Dragons should stalk like tigers and lunge like raptors and soar like . . . raptors (the other kind), not sit on their asses like that old dated mural of dinosaurs that used to be in the natural history museum.

Your right. its Kindof stiff.

ICN_Colossal_Red_Dragon.jpg



its breathing fire, but its pose is so rigid, it doesn't seem to be in combat, its seems to be breathing fire at its leisure. This one definitely rolled bad on his initiative, save for the fire.

you can draw a straight line from its lower pelvis to its skull. For a quadruped, thats really really stiff.

Its arms are too small, almost comically so, in a tragically genetic way.

its legs are fused to almost every aspect of the sculpt.

Its also extremely top heavy. I think its larger then the base is accounting for. Its really about twice the size of the base its under as a quadruped.

Its got some nice detail in the head, and its BIG, but as a sculpture, it doesn't have many good qualities. It also could have had a better counter or venyet. It could have used some asymmetrical balance, and some basic 3 point dzn.

finally its color is... dare i say, too chromatic and too single hued (at least from this picture). It could use some grime and muck. I think more colors would really bring out the details in the sculpture.

if the artiest is reading this, I'm sorry. It has alot of really good qualities and detail, but its base form and shape could use alot of work. good luck on your next one.

PS: McFarlane dragons are really good. I have been meaning to get some. Some have *human* figures, im so going to cut them out when i get a chance.
 
Last edited:

Yeah, the MacFarlane's are pretty awesome, and you can't beat the price. Except that you can occasionally find them on sale. I rounded out my Series 2 set earlier this year at 50% off at my local K*B Toys. The dracolich from the lastest series looks cool enough to pay full price for. Considering that the MacFarlane's have great sculpts, paint jobs, limited poseability and you can get five of them for the cost of the WotC Red Dragon... I have to say I'm a fan.
 

Remove ads

Top