Worlds of Design: Who Needs Spellcasters Anyway?

The most widespread (by far) RPG has been Dungeons & Dragons (D&D), though in quite different forms. And Dungeons & Dragons tends to be dominated by magic users, or more broadly, spell casters. Why is that?
There are no heroes...in life, the monsters win.” George R. R. Martin
Monsters exist, but they are too few in number to be truly dangerous. More dangerous are the common men, the functionaries ready to believe and to act without asking questions.” Primo Levi

(I’m going to ignore that the original players of D&D were wargamers and they were used to artillery and very powerful weapons. Then it’s not surprising that they included magical analogs to those weapons in the then-new game. I’m pursuing the “real world” design reason, if you will.)

In typical medieval fantasy literature the spell casters are generally less powerful and less “in your face” than they are in D&D. The monsters in typical medieval fantasy literature often aren’t terrifically dangerous or numerous, either.

Now think of the real world: yes there are dangerous monsters, but they’re never intelligent, nor are there many of them. Most people are never going to see a grizzly bear, or lion or tiger, or a killer whale, except in a zoo. In many fantasy (and science-fiction) settings there are lots of really dangerous monsters such as dragons and demons that don’t exist in the real world. If you transfer people from the real world to the fantasy world without giving them some kind of “ace in the hole” then even if they do improve considerably in their hand-to-hand combat ability they still don’t have much chance to survive.

So what can the “ace in the hole” be? Technology is what we’re using in the real world; a gun that slings pellets is the great equalizer in many situations, and of course now we have artillery and tanks and jet planes and helicopters to even the odds if Godzilla really does show up, and to overmatch the real-world monsters.

In a fantasy world the Aces are going to be magic and possibly mutations to the race or races (including superheroes). The magic can take two forms, magic items that many people can use, or individuals who can in effect create magic as they go - spell casters. Magic items without powerful spell casters feels wrong (to me), it becomes a kind of technology. So if you want to avoid any “smell” of technology you need individuals who are spell casters.

There’s a big caveat to this. Some RPGs have reduced danger to the characters to almost nothing. When I first discussed this “ace in the hole” idea with a friend he said only when somebody did something really stupid in his game did they risk dying. If the participants are not really afraid of death then they don’t need an ace in the hole. You can play a game without spell casters or perhaps without magic at all, and that will work out. On the other hand, if you play in the older style where the RPG is a game that the players can lose if they are really unlucky or play poorly, then an ace in the hole is definitely needed because without one the players will be overwhelmed.

This brings us back to D&D where, in my experience, magic users do much more damage to opponents than any other class, and quite possibly the majority of the damage to the enemy altogether. Long ago I wrote a simple program (in Basic!) to help me enter numbers to track the relationship over a two day invitational adventure. Unfortunately I can’t put my hands on the results, but magic users were way ahead of any other class in damage done. In short, magic users were the ace in the hole that made the difference in D&D. I’ve tried to diagram this relationship in the below picture.

XY diagram Lethality and Storytelling.jpg

Long ago I played several games with a party that included no arcane magic users, though we did have clerics. It’s a recipe for being constantly worried because there are no magic users to bail you out.

But I also played a one-day game where the GM wanted to see the players (who were strangers to each other) messing with one another. Our characters had to watch the others constantly and didn’t worry about the monsters because, in comparison, monsters were not dangerous. In this case there were some big-time magic users but they were there to threaten other characters, not to keep the party alive. A few characters died, killed by other player characters.

Examples:
  • Cthulu: All the dangers of the old gods have been added. And little to nothing added to player capabilities/options. So it’s not surprising that insanity or death is a typical result
  • Undead Apocalypse: There’s a whole lot of undead, especially zombies, about. Additional player capabilities may include favorable mutations, medical improvements, and situations where undead are at a disadvantage. But it’s still likely pretty desperate without magic.
  • Apocalyptic War: If war has brought the apocalypse, players may have improved technology in weapons. If nuclear war, there can be mutants - on both sides.
  • Science fantasy (e.g., Star Wars): While there may be new unintelligent monsters to fight, the players have blasters and light-sabers. In that situation it’s unsurprising that intelligent beings are the main danger.
  • Gumshoe Detective: It’s very close to real-world, so there’s no need for an ace in the hole beyond pistols and explosives.
We could generalize this for RPGs thus: Compared with the real world, what serious dangers have been added to the game setting/world? And what has been added to player capabilities to counter that?
 

log in or register to remove this ad

Lewis Pulsipher

Lewis Pulsipher

Dragon, White Dwarf, Fiend Folio

Jay Verkuilen

Grand Master of Artificial Flowers
I feel there may be a little divide here between official-play and home games which have a much higher variance.

Yes, there is likely to be a LOT of selection bias there, with many (but not all) con players being much better than home game players, many of whom were kids.
 

log in or register to remove this ad

Yaarel

He Mage
Why do spellcasters predominate?

For me, the appeal of spellcasters include:

• Intuition over habituation
• Imagination over obedience
• Transcendence over limitation
• Moses/Merlin is the modern hero − Gilgamesh/Arthur is the antiquated hero
• Technology = Magic
 


Wiseblood

Adventurer
I think the comparison of damage is putting the cart before the horse. AOE spells do lots of damage IF there are multiple targets BUT would the targets exist if no AOE spells were there? Thus high damage is dependent on both possession of AOE and multiple targets. Also damage is often assumed when spells are cast, hence saving throws for half damage.

The same spellcaster has a distinct damage drop off IF threatened. Spells for defense and spells for escape. Martial characters damage drops because of incapacitation more often.
 

aramis erak

Legend
I don't know where you live, Mr. Pulsipher, but I know that most Alaskans, even those in the third-of-a-million people City of Anchorage, are likely to encounter one of the deadliest animals in North America at least once a year... the Moose. Most will have seen a bear at least once every decade - the city has bears breaking into homes at a rate of 3-5 per year. In the city. We had a recess cancelled at an elementary school due to a grizzly on grounds in downtown Anchorage...

2 of my former students, and a professor I used to chat with between classes, were killed by moose in Anchorage. Another professor was attacked by a moose, but escaped. I was attacked by a moose, as well - on the Glenn Highway, northbound... It was crossing, I slowed. It turned towards me; I slowed again, it continued to track, until it impacted my van's side, while I was stopped. Big, ugly, stupid, deadly... My father was nearly killed by a moose impacting the side of his car at the same spot of the highway.

I've seen a lynx in Portland, Oregon. I've seen a bear less than 10 miles outside Corvallis, Oregon - small one, probably about 250 lbs... along a highway (Oregon 34). I've seen both cougar and lynx near Corvallis...

I've caught fox and good sized deer on my door camera. (didn't save the footage.)

As for Orca? Just head to pretty much any coast in Oregon, Washington, or Alaska, when they're in that part of their migrations. I've seen them from beaches in Newport, Oregon, Anchorage Alaska, and from the docks near Naval Station Seattle, Washington.

Excepting the large blackbear, and the moose, I've not directly interacted with them... but I have encountered them and altered behavior accordingly.

Oh, and a huge number of people keep as pets another dangerous monster... canis lupus familiaris.
 

JeffB

Legend
One of the things I loved most about 4E was that I didn't feel the need to have any class that didn't fit the story/setting. Don't have a world with clerics, no problem. Characters can recover well enough through surges and a potion here or there. Want to run an all Thief campaign? You are not missing out without Fighters or Magic Users. I never was able to do that with previous editions unless I made serious alterations in designing/modding encounters on my side of the screen, or providing a fair amount of items.

As for the discussion at hand- Yes MU's were weak until a certain point. Then, IME they would overshadow the non casters as they started getting into those 3rd level and higher spells. But this was early O/A D&D- Balance was in the hands of the DM and how they "built" their encounters/adventures, and how smart the players were. Even a high level MU who got swarmed by whatever after they got around the fighter/s, was toast. Glass Cannons. It's less of an issue with 5E- they are still cannons, the glass is quite a bit thicker though.
 

aco175

Legend
One of the great equalizers of early casters was their lack of HP and their slow progression rate. The mage needed to get to 7th level before he started to take over the power gap from the other classes. The low (d4) HP per level meant most died before getting to 3rd level and by the time he did get to 7th level, the other classes were 9-11th level due to that class XP chart being faster than the wizard.
 

GMMichael

Guide of Modos
Now think of the real world: yes there are dangerous monsters, but they’re never intelligent, nor are there many of them. Most people are never going to see a grizzly bear, or lion or tiger, or a killer whale, except in a zoo. In many fantasy (and science-fiction) settings there are lots of really dangerous monsters such as dragons and demons that don’t exist in the real world. If you transfer people from the real world to the fantasy world without giving them some kind of “ace in the hole” then even if they do improve considerably in their hand-to-hand combat ability they still don’t have much chance to survive.

Maybe this is just a question of balance. If you're fighting a real world monster, your game should support real world solutions. If you're fighting a magical monster (i.e. a dragon that flies, talks, and breathes fire), then you'll need a magical solution.

Yes, it would be vershtinken to play a non-magical character trying to fight magical monsters.

I don't know where you live, Mr. Pulsipher, but I know that most Alaskans, even those in the third-of-a-million people City of Anchorage, are likely to encounter one of the deadliest animals in North America at least once a year... the Moose. Most will have seen a bear at least once every decade - the city has bears breaking into homes at a rate of 3-5 per year. In the city. We had a recess cancelled at an elementary school due to a grizzly on grounds in downtown Anchorage...

As for Orca? Just head to pretty much any coast in Oregon, Washington, or Alaska, when they're in that part of their migrations. I've seen them from beaches in Newport, Oregon, Anchorage Alaska, and from the docks near Naval Station Seattle, Washington.

Oh, and a huge number of people keep as pets another dangerous monster... canis lupus familiaris.
Nice real-world-monster-compendium here. The early, real world counters to these monsters aren't seen very often anymore: longspears and bows. Also, numbers. You're in trouble if you encounter an angry orca by yourself in a canoe. But if you have ten friends with ten spears, you won't need magic to at least dissuade the beast. Since D&D uses auto-defenses, numbers don't matter as much because your opportunities to defend increase as attacks against you increase.
 

Garthanos

Arcadian Knight
Maybe this is just a question of balance. If you're fighting a real world monster, your game should support real world solutions. If you're fighting a magical monster (i.e. a dragon that flies, talks, and breathes fire), then you'll need a magical solution.

Yes, it would be vershtinken to play a non-magical character trying to fight magical
It might be worth noting that a ton of the legendaries who do this fighting monsters including the arthurians knights were generally described with extraordinary bloodlines.. if not god blood its fae if not that its daemon if not that its dragon. Some take on this aspect after the fact or discover it during a process and it may be magical but rarely spell casty
 
Last edited:

Ovinomancer

No flips for you!
Does anyone else notice that the graph doesn't work with the premise of the article? According to the graph, I can run a high danger, low story (whatever that means) game without an "ace" and also a very low danger, very high story (whatever that means) game with an "ace". This seems exactly backwards of the point.

I think that line needs to start at the origin and move away rather than cut across. If you accept the article's premise, of course, which I only do arguendo.
 

Remove ads

Remove ads

AD6_gamerati_skyscraper

Remove ads

Upcoming Releases

Top