Worst 3.5 Change

What is the worst 3.5 change?

  • Rangers change so much!

    Votes: 5 1.1%
  • No EX for wildshape!

    Votes: 37 8.3%
  • Broken PrCs!

    Votes: 11 2.5%
  • Spell Focus nerfed too far!

    Votes: 66 14.9%
  • Specialists always loose two schools!

    Votes: 20 4.5%
  • Power Attack deals too much damage!

    Votes: 14 3.2%
  • Threat Ranges no longer stack!

    Votes: 47 10.6%
  • Epic stuff is in the DMG now! Ewww!

    Votes: 26 5.9%
  • Dwarves! Oh my God dwarves are amazing now!

    Votes: 15 3.4%
  • Fighting with 2 weapons only one feat?!?

    Votes: 6 1.4%
  • Haste! What did they do you you?!?

    Votes: 17 3.8%
  • Archers shouldn't have been nerfed!

    Votes: 14 3.2%
  • Paladin mount summoning? How dumb!

    Votes: 70 15.8%
  • Animal Companion choices shouldn't be a small list!

    Votes: 22 5.0%
  • Something else that annoys you, but I forgot!

    Votes: 74 16.7%


log in or register to remove this ad

of those you've listed, the only one that bothers me is the paladin mount summoning thing.

and that's only based on the rumors i've heard here. i'm still waiting to read the book for myself to see what the rule really says, and then i may or may not still dislike it.
 

bwgwl said:
of those you've listed, the only one that bothers me is the paladin mount summoning thing.

and that's only based on the rumors i've heard here. i'm still waiting to read the book for myself to see what the rule really says, and then i may or may not still dislike it.

The page has been printed over at gamingreport.com.

I gotta say, for me, it's a tough call between the paladin's mount summoning and square facings. I put the former, but probably should have put the later (which would be other, because it's not on your list), because it will probably be a lot harder to work around in future products.
 


NERF! OH how I hate thee!

I really want to find the person reponsible for coining the term "nerf" and beat him to death with his own shoes.

Really.
 

The paladin summoning... there a couple other things I've got doubts about, but I can't be sure they're bad or not until I see them in play. Summoning a mount, though, is far too stupid to be justified by the playability increase.
 



You didn't mention the new DR rules, which seem to require either an uber-tank fighter who can always get through DR, a golf bag of magic weapons, or spells to change a weapon's type. Used to be that when you had a +5 sword of ungodly power, you knew darn well that if you missed someone with it, you rolled a 1.
 

Psion sez...
The page has been printed over at gamingreport.com.

You sure? No page on paladins that I see in their photos. Table of Contents, Bards, Barbarians, Monk, More Monk, Actions in Combat, Special Attacks, Attacks, Combat, Movement, and Grapple Rules. Nothing on the paladins. If I missed it somewhere, do point out where WotC's verified that rumor.

As for the poll, I'd have to say the only complaint I'd have would be square facings, because that doesn't fit with a lot of the miniatures I have. However, it DOES fit with the WotC miniatures that they're doing, so that'll work well.

~M.
 

Remove ads

Top