• NOW LIVE! Into the Woods--new character species, eerie monsters, and haunting villains to populate the woodlands of your D&D games.

Worst series ending concepts

Kahuna Burger said:
I've realized that the B5 ending was stolen from Little House on the Prairie.

Bear with me here.

Ending takes place several years after the main series.

Setting of the series is destroyed.

Destruction was voluntarily done by the characters.

Main character(s) leave to an unknown destination, in a spiritual mood.

:eek:
:lol:

My fiancee reminded me yesterday of a series ending that really sucked for me. And in this case I have to go back on my own claim that people dislike series endings just because they're endings. This one did suck. ;)

It's a show not many Americans are likely to have seen, though: Sapphire and Steel. It's from the late '70/early '80s, starring Joanna Lumley (AbFab) and David McCallum (NCIS). They played mysterious, inhuman agents of some unexplained force/entity/organization that was responsible for making sure time didn't get "off track". The series finale didn't actually kill off the heroes, but it might as well have done. :(
 

log in or register to remove this ad

sniffles said:
It's a show not many Americans are likely to have seen, though: Sapphire and Steel. It's from the late '70/early '80s, starring Joanna Lumley (AbFab) and David McCallum (NCIS). They played mysterious, inhuman agents of some unexplained force/entity/organization that was responsible for making sure time didn't get "off track". The series finale didn't actually kill off the heroes, but it might as well have done. :(

This has actually been released on DVD over here, there's a boxed set available for 50 or 60 bucks, iirc.
 

I'd have to say one of my least favorite series enders was Farscape. Not because of any fault of the writers - trying to fit an entire season's worth of plot developments into a four hour miniseries just doesn't work very well. I blame the network which picked them up for a fifth season, and then dropped them after the fourth.
 

Storm Raven said:
I'd have to say one of my least favorite series enders was Farscape. Not because of any fault of the writers - trying to fit an entire season's worth of plot developments into a four hour miniseries just doesn't work very well. I blame the network which picked them up for a fifth season, and then dropped them after the fourth.

Here, Here!! Not to mention the fact that the same network insisted on making changes in the beginning of the 4th season to make it easier for "new viewers to catch on". By year 4, if you haven't been watching it you probably won't, so stick to what keeps your loyal fans happy instead of trying to dumb things down for the masses :mad:
 

:)
Rackhir said:
This has actually been released on DVD over here, there's a boxed set available for 50 or 60 bucks, iirc.
Yes, I know. But we already have the Australian release. I hope my complaint about the ending doesn't keep people from watching it. It's still a really good series.
 

sniffles said:
:)
Yes, I know. But we already have the Australian release. I hope my complaint about the ending doesn't keep people from watching it. It's still a really good series.

It is a great series and I have only ever seen it fifth gen VHS recording. What a horrible picture. You have to squint to really see it. :D

Getting the DVDs are on my wish list.
 

Besides, even if that were wise, the last two episodes had way too many Deus Ex Machinas to be decent. The two crazy artifacts, Willow's sudden realization that she could cast a spell to create dozens of superheroes from scratch, and the utter rediculous of Buffy's plan come together to make one cruddy ending.

No kidding. That's one of the things that gets my goat about it. How many Deus Ex Machina's could they cram into a series finale? It seemed like they were intent on finding out. With the scythe, the amulet, Willow's sudden ability to create Slayers, it was a bit much. Then again, both seasons 6 and 7 were incredibly weak. Far as I'm concerned, Buffy the Vampire Slayer was only 5 seasons long, with a couple stand-alone episodes made afterwards. That was it.

As for Babylon 5...

One of these things is not like the others.... maybe it was obsolete as well as old, but log cabins with woodstoves and non-flush toilets are pretty obsolete and yet people buy them all the time.

And how many of them are packed to the brim with artillery, missile batteries, and all kinds of other weapons, and parked right alongside the interstate highway, in a prime position where they can shoot the hell out of any motorists driving by?

It was a navigational hazard not just because it was parked right between the jump gate and the planet it was in orbit of, but because of the possibility of some rogue group, like pirates, taking over the place and using it as a base of operations. And considering how tough it proved in the past, it'd cost an enormous amount of lives to eliminate any pirates or anyone else who takes up residence on Babylon 5. THAT'S why it had to be blown up. It was to expensive to maintain (Especially since pretty much everyone had anti-grav tech at that point. A similar sized base with Minbari anti-grav tech would likely be MUCH cheaper to maintain then B5), it wasn't worthwhile to defend, but they just couldn't leave it out there and allow any schmuck to come along and take possession of it.

So wouldn't you say that having a manned and armed space station right at the entrance of a jump gate would be hazardous to space travel in that solar system? Especially if you're trying to get down to the planet below? It wouldn't be hazardous to have pirates going through that same jump gate and attacking ships in other systems, and being able to return to B5 to resupply?

As for the question of scrap, a lot easier to collect scrap when it's a bunch of little pieces, rather then one big piece. Blowing it apart was likely the quickest way to get that scrap. Taking it apart rivet by rivet would've more then likely taken a LOT longer and more effort for no real gain, since the whole point of scrap is that you smelt it down and reforge it. Doesn't really matter if it's charred at the edges or not.
 

Green Knight said:
No kidding. That's one of the things that gets my goat about it. How many Deus Ex Machina's could they cram into a series finale? It seemed like they were intent on finding out. With the scythe, the amulet, Willow's sudden ability to create Slayers, it was a bit much.

well, just to nitpick, willow used the scythe as a powerful slayer artifact to allow her to awaken the slayers... So those two are really only one. :p

I'm ok with that finale, but it seems to bug a lot of people... would have been nice to spread out those plot points a bit more.
 

Kahuna Burger said:
well, just to nitpick, willow used the scythe as a powerful slayer artifact to allow her to awaken the slayers... So those two are really only one. :p

I'm ok with that finale, but it seems to bug a lot of people... would have been nice to spread out those plot points a bit more.
The scythe/ slayer thing actually made sense from the series historical magic point of view. Willow used the spell she used to awaken one slayer's power, and magnified it using the artifact weapon. The fadct that the weapon went unnoticed in an unnoticed crypt for centuries in Sunnydale (when thers other hell mouths around) was silly. All the writers had to do was put the crypt in another city or far off place to add some believablity. But as previously slated they were rushing.

Waht didn't make sense and what no one can explain is what the HECK was the plan in teh first place. Ok she was going to awaken the slayers ( i bought that) but what were they going to do, kill all the vampires in there. they had no method to deal wit hthe hell mouth (becuse they knew nothing of the charm necklace's power. There wasnt even a vision or a manual on the thing. Quite silly and annoying. I still would like to know if anyone knew what that dang original plan was?
 


Into the Woods

Remove ads

Top