Lonely Tylenol
First Post
Ah, conspiracy theorists.Derren said:Experience and refusing to wear pink glasses.
I guess this refutes your "dragon fatigue" hypothesis.+ Gem dragons + other dragons.
How many different dragons were there in 3E? And when you look into the news there are already people asking for a Draconomicon III Gem Dragons.
In 3e all dragons were pretty much identical except for their breath weapons and spell-like abilities. In 4e I get the impression they're trying to differentiate them to a greater degree, just like they're doing with other monsters that are similar to each other (esp. humanoids). Draconomicon wasn't really about dragons, but was instead about dragon feats, dragon spells, spells for dragons, feats for dragons, dragon gods, dragon prestige classes, prestige classes for dragons, etc. It was just another 3e book full of more feats, spells, and prestige classes. But the art was the shizzle, and nothing in it was notably broken, so it was very well received.Considering that in 3E one book was enough (and it was considered a very good book by many) I don't see a reason why now they have to split this book up into 2 or more. (Except money/marketing considerations of course).
Last edited: