I'm just wondering. For me allowing something so incredibly tied to a particular setting to be played outside of it just jarring and not appealing at all (as DM or a player at the table of a DM doing so). I'm getting the impression that some others feel differently, so I want to see where most are at.
I was expecting a choice for "No, and I wouldn't run Dragonlance without banning Kender, either." Some folks love 'em, others hate 'em.
I really fail to understand how Kender aren't just a renamed halfling. Allowing one is like allowing the other.
That said, when someone asks "can I play a kender," most people assume it means that they want to play a Tasslehoff clone. This is little different than all the gripes about Drizzt clones with their overly tragic stories.
Plus there are no kender in Greyhawk or FR so I'm safe!
What, really? No one's going to...?
Okay, then.
::rolls up sleeves::
View attachment 67795
Flexor, you are /never/ safe from kender. WE ARE EVERYWHERE.
(even on your hat)
Klepto is just a way of playing a character. I can do that now. The immunity to fear thing is just taken from Frodo and company, which halflings share.Halflings aren't inherent kleptos with immunity to fear and all that stuff. Plus there are no kender in Greyhawk or FR so I'm safe!