pawsplay
Hero
Set said:Worst WW game I've played since Hunter, and terribly disappointing.
Ouch.
Set said:Worst WW game I've played since Hunter, and terribly disappointing.
Jim Hague said:I'm with Scott on this one - it's insulting to existing D&D players, implying that they're somehow inferior for playing their game; graduate to a 'real' game, effectively.
Jim Hague said:That they're asking people to destroy perfectly good books is just plain stupid.
Jim Hague said:Mark me as a firm no; and WW just lost my business and that of my gaming group, to boot.
What was your opposition? Deathknights and other signifigant foes will often bring in the minimum damage rules. Saw it in the group's test combat and i did not like it.Set said:A team of Exalted sat around whiffing rolls, doing negligible damage and otherwise just sucking. Worst WW game I've played since Hunter, and terribly disappointing.
Darkwolf71 said:There is a huge difference between a company disposing of their own excess stock (whether donating them somewhere would be a better option or not is a different topic) and a company destroying their competitors book.
@ Imaro, WW is giving the books away for free. They are getting exactly zero reimbursement for the 2e books. They would get the same zero amount without destroying the PHBs.
Imaro said:And what I'm saying is, gaming companies do this all the time with books. What will happen to unsold 3.5 PHB's after 4e is released? Is WotC going to donate or give away these excess books? Nope, they will be stripped(destroyed) and the covers sent back. So again I ask why is WW suddenly evil for doing what they want with books they now own since they are essentially bartering for them, but WotC isn't for doing the same thing with books they own?
pawsplay said:Because it's unnecessary. WotC is just trying to protect their margins, WW is encouraging people, basically, to throw gaming books into the trash.