Mournblade94
Adventurer
The thing is, when you want to find compromise you need to lead by example. 4E fans calling for harmony through more acceptance of 4E isn't really productive.
I completely respect that a lot of people get what they need from 4E and are thrilled by that.
But the other side of that coin exists as well. A lot of people want a game that is not shackled to the limitations of "simple to DM". If we want more harmony, then why not call on WotC to support games for people who want more than simplicity. Obviously it isn't going to happen. I'm not wishing for the impossible here. I'm just saying, if you are calling for peace, leading with how you are going to give is a more inspiring approach.
As for me, if I am forced into picking one or the other between one big happy gaming community and the level of gaming experiece I demand, then Mommy and Daddy are not going to start kissing any time soon.
Most of the Ire towards WOTC comes from older edition gamers that have found a good game unsupported for the new, simpler, shiny game. PAIZO will alleviate that Ire by supporting and improving an already great system.
4e customers have plenty of support, the last thing PAIZO needs to do is add more support and leave the 3rd edition completely unsupported. If the market scews in that direction so be it, I couldn't blame them. The only reason pathfinder would fall short of 4e is the publicity available to WOTC.