[Trailer] Star Trek - Into Darkness

Krug

Newshound

• Mar 10, 2013

• #1

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RxZcxkFZZP0&feature=player_embedded

 

log in or register to remove this ad

sabrinathecat

Explorer

• Mar 11, 2013

• #2

Well, that's definitely a "wait for DVD or Instant View" for me. Remember when Star Trek was new and creative, about exploring new worlds?

 

Morrus

Well, that was fun

Staff member

• Mar 11, 2013

• #3

sabrinathecat said:

Well, that's definitely a "wait for DVD or Instant View" for me. Remember when Star Trek was new and creative, about exploring new worlds?

Click to expand...

Maybe you should just stop watching things! You don't appear to like anything!

 

D

Derren

Hero

• Mar 11, 2013

• #4

Horrible.

2/3 of the trailer looked more like Minority Report 2 with a splash of Indiana Jones turned Gangsta but not Star Trek.

 

G

ggroy

First Post

• Mar 12, 2013

• #5

I will probably end up reading the novelization, before watching the actual movie.

 

Last edited: Mar 12, 2013

Dannager

First Post

• Mar 12, 2013

• #6

sabrinathecat said:

Well, that's definitely a "wait for DVD or Instant View" for me. Remember when Star Trek was new and creative, about exploring new worlds?

Click to expand...

No, I don't. Certainly not the movies.

 

Dannager

First Post

• Mar 12, 2013

• #7

Derren said:

Horrible.

2/3 of the trailer looked more like Minority Report 2 with a splash of Indiana Jones turned Gangsta but not Star Trek.

Click to expand...

What does a Star Trek movie look like?

 

sabrinathecat

Explorer

• Mar 12, 2013

• #8

Morrus said:

Maybe you should just stop watching things! You don't appear to like anything!

Click to expand...

Maybe I just have higher standards.
Or don't enjoy having my intelligence insulted by a movie with a bunch of pretty 20-somethings hiding behind FX with mediocre writing, directing, and acting.
In short, I prefer substance over flash.

 

J

Jhaelen

First Post

• Mar 12, 2013

• #9

sabrinathecat said:

Maybe I just have higher standards.
Or don't enjoy having my intelligence insulted by a movie with a bunch of pretty 20-somethings hiding behind FX with mediocre writing, directing, and acting.
In short, I prefer substance over flash.

Click to expand...

And what Star Trek movie satisfied these 'higher standards'?

 

Dannager

First Post

• Mar 12, 2013

• #10

sabrinathecat said:

Maybe I just have higher standards.
Or don't enjoy having my intelligence insulted by a movie with a bunch of pretty 20-somethings hiding behind FX with mediocre writing, directing, and acting.
In short, I prefer substance over flash.

Click to expand...

That's lovely.

Go ahead and give us a list of your favorite Star Trek movies - you know, the ones that didn't rely on special effects that were modern at the time, and didn't have mediocre writing, directing, or acting.

And maybe drop the nose a few degrees while you're at it. I'm sure you can find a way to express your opinion without implying that everyone excited for the new Star Trek movies prefers flash over substance.