Forked from: The new Star Trek movie is...
Folks, this thread is going to be absolutely filled with movie spoilers.
DO NOT READ THIS IF YOU DON'T WANT TO BE SPOILED
I am going to consider that all sufficient warning that spoiler blocks should not be required in this thread. If you are still reading this, you only have yourself to blame if you learn things you didn't want to know, got it? Any gripes about that will get no sympathy whatsoever.
In general, the rules of RPGs do not equate to the physics of the game world setting, right? By the same logic, I would not take a dramatic necessity of the franchise to imply some sort of physical reality of the fictional universe. They all have to end up on that ship as a business necessity for making the movie.
Because, by your logic, there is no dramatic tension around the lives of Kirk and Spock. The Universe cannot allow these men to die, because they are too important.
I am sorry, but Kirk isn't that unique a human being - one of the major themes of the series is the strength and ability of Humanity, in general, as exemplified by all the Starfleet personnel we see. If the Universe is so un-clever that it cannot find a way to get by without one, single man, and finds it must kill billions of others rather than lose him... Sorry, that stretches plausibility just a bit much.
Much like my biggest problem with the movie. The absolutely most implausible thing, the one point I could not swallow....
You don't give a person fresh out of Academy (ranked Ensign or Lieutenant, at best) command of a starship, much less the biggest, baddest starship around. A machine with enough power to lay waste to an entire planet? The Federation fleet flagship!?! No. Sorry. I don't care how bloody heroic he was. Give him a promotion to be first officer, and then have the next movie be a few years later (since it wouldn't come out for a few years out time anyway) when he's gotten Captain, sure. But not outright command at the end of the movie. That was just wrong.
Not enough to ruin the movie as a whole, but enough to make me gripe about it
Folks, this thread is going to be absolutely filled with movie spoilers.
DO NOT READ THIS IF YOU DON'T WANT TO BE SPOILED
I am going to consider that all sufficient warning that spoiler blocks should not be required in this thread. If you are still reading this, you only have yourself to blame if you learn things you didn't want to know, got it? Any gripes about that will get no sympathy whatsoever.
DonTadow said:But, the intertia thing proved true the entire movie. The coincidences were noted slighly by the old spock and during the conversation with the new spock.
In general, the rules of RPGs do not equate to the physics of the game world setting, right? By the same logic, I would not take a dramatic necessity of the franchise to imply some sort of physical reality of the fictional universe. They all have to end up on that ship as a business necessity for making the movie.
Because, by your logic, there is no dramatic tension around the lives of Kirk and Spock. The Universe cannot allow these men to die, because they are too important.
Also note the several people in the movie who told kirk how important he is (including nero, old spock and captain pike). Kirk is a fixed intertia point, more important than romulus. I say that because you see 6 billion people on one planet, i see trillions of people kirk saved across the universe including the entire federation ten to twenty times over.
I am sorry, but Kirk isn't that unique a human being - one of the major themes of the series is the strength and ability of Humanity, in general, as exemplified by all the Starfleet personnel we see. If the Universe is so un-clever that it cannot find a way to get by without one, single man, and finds it must kill billions of others rather than lose him... Sorry, that stretches plausibility just a bit much.
Much like my biggest problem with the movie. The absolutely most implausible thing, the one point I could not swallow....
You don't give a person fresh out of Academy (ranked Ensign or Lieutenant, at best) command of a starship, much less the biggest, baddest starship around. A machine with enough power to lay waste to an entire planet? The Federation fleet flagship!?! No. Sorry. I don't care how bloody heroic he was. Give him a promotion to be first officer, and then have the next movie be a few years later (since it wouldn't come out for a few years out time anyway) when he's gotten Captain, sure. But not outright command at the end of the movie. That was just wrong.
Not enough to ruin the movie as a whole, but enough to make me gripe about it