This gives me hope, actually. Paladins are not distinct enough to require their own class. All a Paladin is is a Fighter/Cleric. And actually, with the flat math, you can easily get a Paladin by just playing a battle-Cleric. Oh, hey... kind of like the Cleric of Moradin. Y'know, with his Knight Background and Guardian Theme, it's almost as if they're giving us a "Paladin" right from the start.
Fancy that...
I am almost certain that the Cleric will take all of the Paladin's stuff. And I like this, I like it a lot. The Paladin concept is a great archetype and trope, but it doesn't need its own class, not by a long shot.
Weren't there also assassins? Anyone arguing we need all OD&D classes?Gygax did not agree with you on the Paladin.
In OD&D you had Fighting men, Clerics, & Magic Users. Then in the Greyhawk supplement, He added Paladins & Thieves classes.
Gygax did not agree with you on the Paladin.
In OD&D you had Fighting men, Clerics, & Magic Users. Then in the Greyhawk supplement, He added Paladins & Thieves classes.
Um... so? Gygax might not have agreed with my thoughts on American Foreign Policy, either. But that means as little to me as what he'd think of my ideas on Paladins. Gary Gygax may have been instrumental in creating D&D way back when, but that was way back when. Things change.Gygax did not agree with you on the Paladin.
In OD&D you had Fighting men, Clerics, & Magic Users. Then in the Greyhawk supplement, He added Paladins & Thieves classes.