Mistwell
Crusty Old Meatwad (he/him)
You're avoiding again. You jumped in and replied to my statement about the tangent (D&D iconics were asked for Pathfinder iconics were presented... was what was asked for given??) and now are trying to divert the discussion I and a few others were having into one about something different. No you answer the question you jumped in on and then we can move to what you want to discuss...
I am not trying to divert anything - you're free to have your discussion. But I, and everyone else, were discussing perceptions of inclusiveness in "D&D" when that iconics issue arose. The whole purpose of the iconics issue was to discuss perceptions of inclusiveness as seen in the issue of "D&D" iconics. You're free to comment on that or not - but you can't both comment on it and then pretend you were not commenting on it simultaneously. You're not Schrodinger's Cat.