Looks like it's time for a Warlord Sub-Forum Again...somehow.

[steeldragons]

Seriously. Half the threads in the top ten of the 5e forum are all rehashing Warlords: yay/naye, how, why, what do they get....

Didn't we do all of this already last year?

 

[Satyrn]

Another forum I frequent has a "hugs" rating for posts.

I really want to rate your post

 

[mellored]

Seriously. Half the threads in the top ten of the 5e forum are all rehashing Warlords: yay/naye, how, why, what do they get....

Didn't we do all of this already last year?

So you start yet another thread?

 

[lowkey13]

*Deleted by user*

 

[Bigsta]

Obviously magic would be required resurrect the sub-forum, because it's absolutely ridiculous to think you could just "shout" it back into existence.

 

[Yunru]

It's weird, because at least half the posts say the Warlord's not wnated by anyone except a minority, and yet here we are again.

 

[Eubani]

It's weird, because at least half the posts say the Warlord's not wnated by anyone except a minority, and yet here we are again.

Probably the same group that dishonestly screams that a martial character doing more than "I attack" and the occasional ability check is using magic.

 

[transtemporal]

I actually don't know what a warlord is. Was it a class in a previous edition or something?

If only there was someone to explain it...

 

[Yunru]

Probably the same group that dishonestly screams that a martial character doing more than "I attack" and the occasional ability check is using magic.

Yeah, Warlord abilities are pure psychological in their basis, not mystical.

 

[Yunru]

I actually don't know what a warlord is. Was it a class in a previous edition or something?

If only there was someone to explain it...

Warlords play Pot of Greed.

Unless you weren't joking, in which case it's been in several generations under different names. 4e's was the Warlord.