• NOW LIVE! Into the Woods--new character species, eerie monsters, and haunting villains to populate the woodlands of your D&D games.

What is the essence of D&D

  • Thread starter Thread starter lowkey13
  • Start date Start date
Underground tunnel delving required really? Not cities and mysterious forests with Temples to evil gods and castles with realistic one room tiny actual dungeons?

Yeah, I'm with S'mon. There are lots of aspects of D&D I enjoy, but without going into spooky underground complexes with monsters, it just wouldn't be the same.
 

log in or register to remove this ad

you notice that you just put the words of a literal supervillain ?
. Syndrome was the super-villain in Incredibles. Both he and Dash said that line, though, or something close to it "that's just another way of saying nobody is," I think, was Dash's version.

Let's see:

Elastigirl: Everyone is special, Dash.
Dash Parr: That's just another way of saying no one is.

later,

Syndrome: And when everyone's super, [evil Laugh] no-one will be.

OK, paraphrasing either way.


But, yes, it is essentially the same sentiment as the whole samey-classes/fighters-cast-spells/magic-doesn't-feel-magical line of criticism. I repeated it because I'd heard it in this context more than a few times.
And, yes, it's been pointed out before that Syndrome said it, too, to little effect.
 
Last edited:

zJcFaqd.gif
 

. Syndrome was the super-villain in Incredibles. Both he and Dash said that line, though, or something close to it "that's just another way of saying nobody is," I think, was Dash's version.
So the people in whose mouths you're putting these words aren't supervillains -- they're just angry children?

Have you considered not putting words in peoples' mouths at all?
 

So the people in whose mouths you're putting these words aren't supervillains -- they're just angry children?
Have you considered not putting words in peoples' mouths at all?
Oh, you joined in 2011.

From 2008:

So, yeah, folks were quoting Syndrome (or Dash) in summing up their reactions to the way, well, 4e repudiated the Primacy of Magic. I didn't make use the quote then. I just alluded to its usage.

Really, it was a much-beaten drum.
 
Last edited:

@Tony Vargas

Ask a whole bunch of other players who made the upgrade. You will get a broad variety of reasons. Will some of them give you stuff that sounds kind of like this "Primacy of Magic" idea? Yes, of course. But if you cite those reasons to say "Aha! I was right! Primacy of Magic is the essence of D&D and the reason why 4E failed through no fault of its own!", and ignore all the other reasons that have nothing whatsoever to do with Primacy of Magic but maybe do find some fault in 4E... well, then, that's what's known as cherry-picking.
 



Ummm @TheCosmicKid, perhaps actually addressing the point rather that get upset about a single sentence might be more productive?

I mean there’s a whole wall of text there with considerable supporting evidence. Getting twisted up in a single line seems a little pointless.
 

So what I'm taking from this is that Fighters and Rogues can go naughty word themselves like the dirt-eating peasants they are? And if they get uppity, the magic bougie boot should stomp them back down post-haste?

Wow, thank you people.

Nope there's more than one way to defang magic.

You need some of the classics in their though.

Cheap n cheerful magic items in 3E was a mistake. Letting players buy them is probably another one (3E and 4E).
 
Last edited:

Into the Woods

Remove ads

Top