FrogReaver
The most respectful and polite poster ever
Changing the narrative description of a spell is a sensible change. Changing the triggering condition of a spell is not.
Why?
Changing the narrative description of a spell is a sensible change. Changing the triggering condition of a spell is not.
Still seems to me that a class feature that says it doubles the range of a spell should reasonably double the range you are able to cast a spell. But you keep saying it doens't do that for counterspell which is so odd.
No, it doesn't, despite your insistence that it does. I tweeted JC so i am waiting to see if he responds. Anyway, Distant Spell affects the Range, not the triggering evening.Of course it affects the trigger. You wouldn't be able to cast it 120 ft (double the distance) if it didn't affect the trigger...
Humorously, an Elven Druid with Timeless Body would eventually win by living longer than everyone but explicitly immortal races.H Draw means the Druid loses and has a score of 0 against every other class; ie, is the worst.
Because redundancy makes things easier to understand.If you can distant spell Counterspell, then what is the point of giving the reaction a 60 foot limit in the first place?
(which brings to mind an off-topic post - how could a PC become a lich?)Humorously, an Elven Druid with Timeless Body would eventually win by living longer than everyone but explicitly immortal races.![]()
Probably wish, the Book of Vile Darkness, or maybe vecna. He could maybe kill himself with Finger of Death, maybe...(which brings to mind an off-topic post - how could a PC become a lich?)
No, it doesn't, despite your insistence that it does. I tweeted JC so i am waiting to see if he responds. Anyway, Distant Spell affects the Range, not the triggering evening.