Who says the damage needs to be visible for you to know you took it?Im not totally sure about that..
What is visible on psychic damage?
Lets discuss about It.
Who says the damage needs to be visible for you to know you took it?Im not totally sure about that..
What is visible on psychic damage?
Lets discuss about It.
I completely agree on that.Even in the absence of knowing exactly what spell it was, it's not unreasonable for an intelligent creature to figure there's a spell (or a spell attack, which doesn't have to be a spell, because 5E) and start looking for what's doing it. Sitting there until the psychic damage kills them--that seems unreasonably stupid to me.
He is capable if ignoring any rules text he finds inconvenient. It's his superpower.You seem to be ignoring those last 5 words.
How perceptible is psychic damage?Who says the damage needs to be visible for you to know you took it?
It was already quoted about a million posts ago but he does not answer to rules that contradict his own view of how we should play D&DYou mean this?
Perceiving a Caster at WorkMany spells create obvious effects: explosions of fire, walls of ice, teleportation, and the like. Other spells, such as charm person, display no visible, audible, or otherwise perceptible sign of their effects, and could easily go unnoticed by someone unaffected by them.You seem to be ignoring those last 5 words.
How perceptible is psychic damage?
It's damage.How perceptible is psychic damage?
Probably head splitting pain, possibly bleeding from the ears or nose.Im not totally sure about that..
What is visible on psychic damage?
Lets discuss about It.