Twiggly the Gnome
Legend
I'd be all for that, especially if they added more of them, using that feat and a half of design space that floating ASIs are currently taking a giant dump on.
D&D 5E Wow! No more subraces. The Players Handbook races reformat to the new race format going forward.
- Thread starter Yaarel
- Start date
- Status
Faolyn
(she/her)
Because a floating +2/+1 could be placed in something the player finds useful.
Faolyn
(she/her)
That's why I'm liking Level Up, since it's all about the customizable, flavorful heritage abilities and the ASIs are attached to background, not race or class.
Scribe
Legend
It doesn't have to be, it's a choice to lean into, or not.
Regardless, we all know it's a meaningless circle at this point, you won, I lost.
You'll never accept that I have valid reasons for liking the way it worked for 40 years, and I'll never accept Floating couldn't just be another option.
Array, Buy, Roll
Fixed, Floating
Options.
sounds good but I don't know this @Morrus guy doesn't sound very familiur...does anyone know if this company is any good?
I wonder if there are enough that feel that way if the new DMG could have optional fixed stats for heritages....It doesn't have to be, it's a choice to lean into, or not.
Regardless, we all know it's a meaningless circle at this point, you won, I lost.
You'll never accept that I have valid reasons for liking the way it worked for 40 years, and I'll never accept Floating couldn't just be another option.
Array, Buy, Roll
Fixed, Floating
Options.
Design space.
WOTC wants it backwards compatible and they made the original races weak.
Scribe
Legend
There certainly are some. You can see it when people comment on Twitter every time a new option is presented.
Enough? That Wizards cares about?
I doubt it.
Scribe
Legend
When they release the 5.5 I'm sure the original options will be buffed.
That's not backwards compatible then.
- Status
Similar Threads
