D&D 5E A Compilation of all the Race Changes in Monsters of the Multiverse

Over on Reddit, user KingJackel went through the video leak which came out a few days ago and manually compiled a list of all the changes to races in the book. The changes are quite extensive, with only the fairy and harengon remaining unchanged. The book contains 33 races in total, compiled and updated from previous Dungeons & Dragons books...

Over on Reddit, user KingJackel went through the video leak which came out a few days ago and manually compiled a list of all the changes to races in the book. The changes are quite extensive, with only the fairy and harengon remaining unchanged. The book contains 33 races in total, compiled and updated from previous Dungeons & Dragons books.

greg-rutkowski-monsters-of-the-multiverse-1920.jpg



 

log in or register to remove this ad

I actually love this from a world building perspective. It introduces a sense of mystery to magic, where there is “known” magic and “undiscovered” magic. You can take this in a number of different directions. 10th level spells? Types of magic that have been forgotten by time? Spells that you can research, but perhaps at the cost of your psychological well being (as in CoC)? “Magic” that is in fact alien technology? As with cosmology, there is something to be gained by not overdefining everything

But NPCs aren't only enemies. The cleric PCs best friend, with whom they shared a dorm in the temple orphanage and then came through novitiate classes alongside, studying under the same crusty old abbot, should not have a set of spells and abilities that are completely alien, mysterious, and unknown to the cleric PC.
 
Last edited:

log in or register to remove this ad



Remathilis

Legend
Because he's an NPC.

Or, less flippant, he does but when it is time to roll initiative his magical abilities are streamlined and available for ease of use. Oh, and some of them are weird esoteric spells of unknown origin that cause your liver to leap out of your body and attack you.
DM: You've defeated Telenicus the Merciless, Archmage of the Nine Realms....

PC wizard: Wow, a powerful archmage! I take his spellbook. I'm sure he has some powerful spells in it for me to copy!

DM: You open his tome. Inside, you find page after page of blank parchment, save for the first page which contains an intricately designed image of a hand upholding a single middle digit.
 


Oh come on. The word "moralizing" certainly isn't being used correctly upthread, but you know perfectly well what was meant. Engage in the argument, not petty semantics to mock other posters.
Well…words have meaning? Calling the changes moralizing suggests that wotc is being didactic and preachy and self-important by changing the flavor of the monster descriptions but not the mechanics. Calling the changes “moral” or “ethical” suggests that they are making a sincere effort to remove harmful stereotypes. I’ve seen both positions articulated online, including on this site, including in this thread.
 





Remove ads

Remove ads

Top