• The VOIDRUNNER'S CODEX is coming! Explore new worlds, fight oppressive empires, fend off fearsome aliens, and wield deadly psionics with this comprehensive boxed set expansion for 5E and A5E!

D&D 5E D&D and who it's aimed at

Vaalingrade

Legend
My favorite part of about the phrase 'disneyfication' is the fact that right now Disney is scrambling to retrofit their newly acquired sex and violence-filled shows into Disney plus.

So the most disneyfied thing right now is an action adventure/supernatural thriller about a DID sufferer being enslaved by an Egyptian god with a bird skull for a face to take on a cult and he kills like a pile of dudes every episode.
 

log in or register to remove this ad

My favorite part of about the phrase 'disneyfication' is the fact that right now Disney is scrambling to retrofit their newly acquired sex and violence-filled shows into Disney plus.

So the most disneyfied thing right now is an action adventure/supernatural thriller about a DID sufferer being enslaved by an Egyptian god with a bird skull for a face to take on a cult and he kills like a pile of dudes every episode.
yup.... Marvel is just so Disneyfied...
 


Zardnaar

Legend
I think you're confusing juvenile edgy nonsense with "adult" content.

3E had what, The Book of Vile Darkness? Anything else? And the BoVD was basically a 14-year-old edgelord's idea of what "adult" or "mature" content looked like.

Art and the adventures as well. Dungeon magazine.
5E has been sanitized so there's less variety in effect. 3E had "kiddie" stuff as well.
 

EzekielRaiden

Follower of the Way
Going back to, "it's just an elf-game" is the laziest argument this forum can produce. Not very respectful either. I'm really tired of seeing it.
Your argument would have more bite if the people being told "it's just an elf game" were actually being respectful in the first place. Considering most of them are not, and are in fact crapping on others' preferences, I see no reason to give their arguments any more thought than that.

Now, if you want to actually have a conversation about finding a healthy balance point between extremes, e.g. "violence doesn't have to always be the answer, but it's unbelievable and off-putting to have literally all problems solvable with a spot of afternoon tea," sure, we can discuss it, and asking for respect is entirely warranted. But when literally not even two dozen posts above yours, someone just posted a set of pictures (most of which reference classic D&D content to begin with, just being brought to the modern day) and dismisses literally all of it as immature, yeah, I'm not inclined to give that opinion any more respect than it offered to me in the first place.

ETA: Yes, Mothership and DCC funnels can be very silly in their own ways, but often because of how grotesque and over-the-top the violence is, which is different, imo, from space hamsters and such, where the game is presenting you with jokey, silly material, as opposed to the jokes and silliness that emerge at the table.
That absolutely looks just as escapist to me. Both things escape from mundanity to adventure, but the silly/goofy escapes from (essentially) malaise of modern mundane life, while the grotesque violence escapes from the..."nannying," for lack of a better term. Likewise my preferences, namely high-flying action, larger than life characters, and good people wrestling with making the right choice but ultimately doing the right thing (or making amends if they err) while bad people ultimately seek redemption (even if they don't find it) or suffer the consequences of their villainy, is an escape from mundanity. But they're all equally escapes.

I hear your point, but can't resist saying that I kind of seeing it in reverse: Whatever gives us pleasure is not a "stupid waste of time," and some of it -- the stuff that touches us deeply, or inspires a creative spark - is what provides a sense of meaning and joy.
Agreed. CS Lewis had similar thoughts on friendship. "It has no survival value. Rather, it is one of the things which gives value to survival."
 

Art and the adventures as well. Dungeon magazine.
Like what? I'd like some specifics here.

3E's "default" art style was the Wayne Reynolds/WAR style, which is in fact extremely to the style 5E uses. There was nothing remotely "adult" about that comic-book-y art style, in fact I'd say it looked very much like it was aimed squarely at older teens, rather than adults.

So where was the "adult" art?

The only art difference I can see is it felt like 3E maybe spent a bit more on art (sometimes in weird places, like Dragon magazine...) than 5E does. 4E had a virtually identical art-style to 3E, as well.

What adventures in Dungeon (which is available in full on the web I believe) are your referring to?

5E has been sanitized so there's less variety in effect.
I'm just not seeing any evidence to support this.

I agree that 5E has a boring-as-hell art style that's very safe - but so does 3E. All post-2E D&D has been extremely safe, art-wise.
 

Maxperson

Morkus from Orkus
My favorite part of about the phrase 'disneyfication' is the fact that right now Disney is scrambling to retrofit their newly acquired sex and violence-filled shows into Disney plus.

So the most disneyfied thing right now is an action adventure/supernatural thriller about a DID sufferer being enslaved by an Egyptian god with a bird skull for a face to take on a cult and he kills like a pile of dudes every episode.
Disney owns Marvel. Marvel is not Disney. If you look at the Disney products coming out, those are Disneyfied. That doesn't mean that Marvel movies on Disney+ will be.
 


Zardnaar

Legend
Like what? I'd like some specifics here.

3E's "default" art style was the Wayne Reynolds/WAR style, which is in fact extremely to the style 5E uses. There was nothing remotely "adult" about that comic-book-y art style, in fact I'd say it looked very much like it was aimed squarely at older teens, rather than adults.

So where was the "adult" art?

The only art difference I can see is it felt like 3E maybe spent a bit more on art (sometimes in weird places, like Dragon magazine...) than 5E does. 4E had a virtually identical art-style to 3E, as well.

What adventures in Dungeon (which is available in full on the web I believe) are your referring to?


I'm just not seeing any evidence to support this.

I agree that 5E has a boring-as-hell art style that's very safe - but so does 3E. All post-2E D&D has been extremely safe, art-wise.

Paizo era Dungeon some if the adventures were R16 borderline R18 although implied.

One had an orgy in the background (Savage Tide Malcanthets domain).

BoVD had art like angels getting impaled and things like the nymph.
 

dave2008

Legend
To me it would be like trying to run a Star Wars game without having seen the films.
I don't see a problem with that. I generally know only what the DM tells me when I play in any setting. Though I mostly DM, and pretty much exclusively DM our own settings.

PS - If you played 4e then you have a good background for the setting.
Plus, getting random players on the Internet for VTT play would significantly increase the chances of getting players with different expectations.
That could be an issue. I only DM with people I know.
I need to pop back on and see how the development is going. The last time I was on it was kind of a blank character sheet with no compendium information, and everything needed to be manually entered. Which would be a lot of extra work for me, in addition to writing and planning adventures.
I would wait a few more months when they get everything entered.
 

Remove ads

Top