Whizbang Dustyboots
Gnometown Hero
Apparently the biggest costs in most cable bills are ESPN and Fox News, both of which have must-carry clauses in their contracts with cable providers. (And it's why people wanting to boycott Fox News advertisers don't have much of an impact: Ad revenue is a tiny portion of their revenue.)I had cable for decades, but when I got married I was happy to dump it -- most of the stuff I liked kept getting canned, and why am I paying for 12 ESPNs when I don't even watch one of them? Plus, it cut my cable bill in half, and the streaming costs were far lower.
If you don't watch either of those, cable is wildly overpriced.
If cable companies switched those to channels users had to pay for a la carte, there'd be mass layoffs at both companies.
The irony is that HBO and Disney, which have the strongest catalogs, are so busy shooting themselves in the foot that they might help the Peacocks and Paramount+ survive longer than they logically should. (Hulu is likely to be part of Disney+ by the end of 2024, so it'll both survive and die, complicating things.)I think the property owners are taking big risks thinking they own enough content to go it their own way.